RulesofCivilProcedure.com Civil Procedure · Every State

Rule 1.1301.For what causes

Division XIII: Quo Warranto · Last amended February 15, 2002 · Last verified July 15, 2026

In one sentenceRule 1.1301 authorizes a civil quo warranto action, tried as an equitable proceeding, in the state's name against a defendant unlawfully holding public office or corporate franchise, a corporation exceeding its lawful powers, or someone whose state-granted patent, permit, certificate, or license was obtained by fraud or mistake, has expired, or has been violated or forfeited.

Full Text of Rule 1.1301

Text sizeJump to: (1) (2) (3) (4) (5)

A civil action in the nature of quo warranto, triable by equitable proceedings, may be brought in the name of the state against any defendant who is any of the following:
(1) Unlawfully holding or exercising any public office or franchise in Iowa, or an office in any Iowa corporation.
(2) A public officer who has done or suffered to be done, an act which works a forfeiture of the office.
(3) Acting as a corporation in Iowa without being authorized by law so to act.
(4) A corporation exercising powers not conferred by law, or doing or omitting acts, which work a forfeiture of its corporate rights or privileges.
(5) A person or corporation claiming under a patent, permit, certificate of convenience and necessity or license of any nature which was granted by the state because of fraud, or mistake or ignorance of a material fact, or the terms of which have expired or been violated by the defendant, or which the defendant has in any manner forfeited. The action in such cases shall be to annul or vacate the patent, permit, certificate or license in question.

Plain-English Summary

Quo warranto is not an everyday civil remedy — it's a distinct action for challenging someone's legal right to hold a public office, exercise a corporate franchise, or act under a state-granted authorization at all. Rule 1.1301 opens Iowa's version of this action, describing it as a civil action in the nature of quo warranto, triable by equitable proceedings, brought in the name of the state rather than in the name of a private plaintiff.

The rule lists who can be sued this way. It reaches a defendant unlawfully holding or exercising a public office or franchise in Iowa, or an office in an Iowa corporation, and a public officer who has done or allowed something that forfeits the office. It also reaches a person or entity acting as a corporation in Iowa without lawful authorization, and a corporation that exercises powers the law never gave it, or that does or fails to do something that forfeits its corporate rights or privileges.

The fifth category covers someone claiming rights under a state-granted patent, permit, certificate of convenience and necessity, or license — where that grant was obtained through fraud, mistake, or ignorance of a material fact, or where its term has expired or its conditions have been violated or forfeited by the holder. For that category, the rule states the goal of the action directly: to annul or vacate the patent, permit, certificate, or license in question.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is a quo warranto action used for in Iowa?

Rule 1.1301 authorizes it as a civil action, tried by equitable proceedings and brought in the name of the state, to challenge someone unlawfully holding a public office or franchise, a corporation exceeding its lawful powers, or a person whose state-granted patent, permit, certificate, or license was improperly obtained, has expired, or has been violated.

Can quo warranto be used against a private corporation, not just a public officeholder?

Yes. Rule 1.1301(3) and (4) cover a person or entity acting as a corporation without lawful authorization, and a corporation exercising powers not conferred by law or engaging in conduct that forfeits its corporate rights or privileges.

What can quo warranto do about a license or permit that was fraudulently obtained?

Rule 1.1301(5) allows the action against someone claiming under a patent, permit, certificate of convenience and necessity, or license granted because of fraud, mistake, or ignorance of a material fact, or whose terms have expired or been violated, and it directs that the action seek to annul or vacate that grant.

Is quo warranto brought by a private citizen in their own name?

No, under Rule 1.1301 it is brought in the name of the state, though rule 1.1302 addresses the circumstances under which a private citizen can be the one to bring it.

Is a quo warranto action tried like an ordinary law action, with a jury?

No. Rule 1.1301 specifies the action is triable by equitable proceedings, which follows a different procedural track than an ordinary jury trial.

Source & verification. Rule text and the Comment are reproduced verbatim from the Iowa Rules of Civil Procedure, adopted by the Iowa Supreme Court. Last verified July 15, 2026. · Official source
Also known as: iowa quo warranto rulechallenge unlawful public office iowaquo warranto corporate franchise iowaannul license fraud iowa quo warrantowho can be sued quo warranto iowa