Rule 5.DISCOVERY IN CIVIL ACTIONS
Rule 5. DISCOVERY IN CIVIL ACTIONS · Not amended since adoption on record · Last verified July 17, 2026
Full Text of Rule 5
Plain-English Summary
This short provision does a job that has nothing to do with how discovery works — it fixes the starting line. Rule 5’s discovery scheme, with its deadlines for completing discovery and its requirements for filing certificates of service, didn’t reach back and disrupt cases that were already underway when the rule took effect. It applied going forward from January 1, 1986, and no earlier.
For anyone litigating in Georgia superior court today, this transitional line has no ongoing bite — every pending case was filed long after 1986. What it shows is how the drafters handled the rollout of a new discovery regime: rather than forcing parties mid-case to suddenly restart their discovery clock under new rules, they drew a clean date and let older cases finish under whatever procedure governed them before.
Frequently Asked Questions
What does this provision say?
That Rule 5 “shall not be applied in any case prior to January 1, 1986.”
Does this provision still limit which cases Rule 5 covers today?
Not in practice — it addressed the transition when the discovery rule was adopted, and every case pending in superior court today was filed long after that 1986 date.
What does “Rule 5” encompass under this heading?
The entire discovery-in-civil-actions rule, including provisions such as the prompt completion deadline and the discovery filing requirements found in its numbered sub-rules.
Why would a discovery rule need a start date written into it?
To give a clear line for which actions the new discovery procedures governed, rather than disrupting cases already in progress when the rule took effect.
Does this provision itself set any discovery deadline?
No. It only fixes an effective date; the deadlines themselves are set out in later sub-rules such as Rule 5.1’s six-month completion period.