Rule 5.4.Early Planning Conference and Discovery Plan
Rule 5. DISCOVERY IN CIVIL ACTIONS · Last amended 2015 · Last verified July 17, 2026
In one sentenceRule 5.4 lets Georgia civil litigants agree to, be ordered into, or petition for an early discovery planning conference covering claims, evidence preservation, and a discovery schedule, and afterward lets them submit an agreed discovery plan — or, lacking agreement, a joint report flagging their disputes — to the court within fourteen days.
(1)The parties may agree to an early planning discovery conference, the judge may order the parties to hold an early planning discovery conference, or a party may petition the court for an early planning discovery conference. The conference may be held in the county in which the action is pending or at such other place or by such other means as agreeable to the court. A discovery conference may be held by telephone, by video conference, or in person, or a
combination thereof, unless the court orders the parties to attend in person. During an early planning discovery conference, the parties shall:
a.Consider the nature and basis of the parties’ claims and defenses and the possibilities of settling the case;
b.Resolve any issues regarding the scope of preservation of information;
c.Discuss the preparation of a discovery plan; and
d.Discuss any such issues as are relevant to the case.
(2)After an early planning discovery conference, the parties may submit an agreed upon discovery plan within 14 days of the meeting and may request a conference with the court regarding the plan. Unless the parties agree otherwise, the attorney for the plaintiff shall be responsible for submitting the discovery plan to the court. The discovery plan may include:
a.A statement of the issues in the case and a brief factual outline;
b.A schedule of discovery including discovery of electronically stored information;
c.A defined scope of preservation of information and appropriate conditions for terminating the duty to preserve prior to the final resolution of the case;
d.The format by which electronically stored information will be produced; and
e.Sources of any stored information that is not reasonably accessible because of undue burden or cost.
(3)If a discovery plan is not agreed upon, the parties may submit to the court within 14 days of the meeting a joint report indicating the agreed upon parts of the discovery plan and the position of each party on the parts upon which they disagree. The court shall confer in an appropriate manner with the parties to resolve any outstanding issues.
Plain-English Summary
Rule 5.4 gives Georgia civil litigants a structured way to plan discovery before it turns into a fight. Getting to the conference table can happen three ways: the parties can agree to hold an early planning discovery conference, the judge can order one, or a party can petition the court to convene one. The conference itself is flexible — by phone, video, in person, or some mix, unless the court insists on an in-person meeting.
Once at the table, the rule asks the parties to cover specific ground: the nature and basis of the claims and defenses and whether settlement is realistic, any disputes over how broadly information needs to be preserved, the shape of a discovery plan, and anything else relevant to the case. A workable discovery plan can go further still, addressing electronically stored information — its schedule, its production format, and which sources are too burdensome or costly to reach — along with the scope of preservation and when the duty to preserve can end.
The rule keeps a tight clock on the paperwork that follows. Within fourteen days of the meeting, the parties may submit an agreed plan, with the plaintiff’s attorney responsible for submitting it unless the parties agree otherwise. If they can’t agree, they instead submit a joint report within that same fourteen days, showing what they agree on and where each side stands on the rest, and the court steps in to help resolve whatever remains unsettled.
Frequently Asked Questions
How can an early planning discovery conference come about?
The parties may agree to one, the judge may order one, or a party may petition the court for one.
What must the parties address during the conference?
The nature and basis of the claims and defenses and the possibility of settlement, any issues about the scope of preserving information, preparation of a discovery plan, and any other relevant issues.
Who is responsible for submitting the discovery plan to the court?
Unless the parties agree otherwise, the attorney for the plaintiff.
How much time do the parties have to submit a plan or joint report after the conference?
Fourteen days from the meeting.
What happens if the parties cannot agree on a discovery plan?
They may submit a joint report within fourteen days showing the agreed-upon parts and each party’s position on the disputed parts, and the court will confer with them to resolve the outstanding issues.
Amendment History
Adopted effective June 4, 2015.
Source & verification. Rule text and amendment history are
reproduced verbatim from the Uniform Superior Court Rules, published by the
Council of Superior Court Judges of Georgia. Last verified July 17, 2026.
· Official source
Also known as:georgia early planning discovery conferenceUSCR 5.4 discovery plangeorgia discovery plan requirements civil caseESI discovery plan superior court georgiafourteen day discovery plan deadline georgiaelectronically stored information discovery georgia rule