Rule 33.5.Responsibilities of the Trial Judge
Rule 33. PLEADING BY DEFENDANT · Last amended 1997 · Last verified July 17, 2026
Full Text of Rule 33.5
Plain-English Summary
Rule 33.5 keeps the judge at arm’s length from plea bargaining while still leaving room to weigh in once the parties have something to show. The judge should stay out of the back-and-forth between prosecutor and defense counsel that produces a plea deal.
Once the parties reach a tentative deal, though, they can ask the judge to look at it early, before the plea is formally offered, along with the reasoning behind it. The judge may then tell both sides whether the proposed outcome looks likely to stick, assuming the presentence report or the plea hearing backs up what the parties described. If things later turn out differently from what the judge signaled, the judge has to explain, on the record, which details changed the calculation.
Even where a plea deal exists, the judge cannot rubber-stamp it. The judge weighs the agreement seriously but still has to reach an independent call, measured against the principles in Rule 33.6, on whether the case warrants charge or sentence leniency.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is the trial judge allowed to take part in plea discussions?
Rule 33.5(A) says the trial judge should not join the negotiations between prosecutor and defense — guidance framed as a strong recommendation rather than an outright ban.
Can the judge preview a tentative plea agreement before the plea is entered?
Yes, on the parties’ request, and the judge may tell both sides whether the deal they describe looks likely to hold up.
What happens if the judge indicated likely concurrence but the final sentence differs from the plea agreement?
The judge must explain, on the record, which details from the presentence report or the hearing led the court to depart from the plea deal.
Is a judge bound to grant the leniency contemplated by a plea agreement?
No. Rule 33.5(C) requires the judge to weigh the agreement seriously but still reach an independent call under the principles in section 33.6.
What must line up for the judge’s earlier signal of likely approval to hold?
What comes out at the plea hearing, or shows up in the presentence report, has to match what the parties told the judge earlier.
Amendment History
Amended effective October 9, 1997.