§ 9-9-54.Termination of arbitral proceedings
Chapter 9. Arbitration · Article 1. General Provisions · Last amended 2012 · Last verified July 17, 2026
Full Text of § 9-9-54
Plain-English Summary
Every arbitration has to end somewhere, and this section describes the two ways that happens. Most commonly, a final award closes the case. The alternative is a tribunal order terminating the proceedings without ever reaching a decision on the merits.
Three situations trigger that kind of order. A claimant can withdraw its claim, ending things — unless the respondent objects and the tribunal agrees the respondent has a legitimate interest in getting a final resolution rather than being left in limbo. The parties can agree between themselves to stop. Or the tribunal itself can find that continuing has become unnecessary or impossible for some other reason, covering situations the code doesn’t spell out individually.
Termination is not just a formality — it switches off the tribunal’s authority. The tribunal’s mandate ends when the proceedings do, with two narrow exceptions: it keeps authority to correct, interpret, or supplement the award under Code Section 9-9-55, and to resume proceedings if a court suspends a setting-aside action under Code Section 9-9-56 to give the tribunal a chance to fix the problem.
Frequently Asked Questions
What are the two ways an arbitral proceeding can end?
It ends either through a final arbitration award or through an order of the tribunal terminating the proceedings.
Can a claimant withdraw its claim and end the case?
Usually — but if the respondent objects and the tribunal recognizes a legitimate interest by the respondent in obtaining a final settlement of the dispute, withdrawal alone will not end the proceedings.
Besides withdrawal, what else can trigger a termination order?
The parties can agree to terminate the proceedings, or the tribunal can find that continuing has become unnecessary or impossible for some other reason.
Does the tribunal lose all authority once the proceedings terminate?
Almost — its mandate terminates along with the proceedings, except for the authority it keeps under Code Section 9-9-55 to correct, interpret, or supplement the award, and under Code Section 9-9-56(d) if a court suspends a setting-aside proceeding.
Can the respondent block a claimant’s attempt to withdraw and walk away?
Yes — if the respondent objects and the tribunal recognizes a legitimate interest in obtaining a final settlement, the tribunal need not terminate the proceedings just because the claimant withdrew.
Amendment History
Code 1981, § 9-9-54, enacted by Ga. L. 2012, p. 961, § 1/SB 383.