§ 9-9-41.Procedure to be followed by arbitration tribunal
Chapter 9. Arbitration · Article 1. General Provisions · Last amended 2012 · Last verified July 17, 2026
Full Text of § 9-9-41
Plain-English Summary
Arbitration’s biggest selling point over litigation is that the people involved get to build the process instead of inheriting one off the shelf. This section puts that principle into Georgia law for international arbitration: parties are free to agree on their own procedure, whether that means adopting an institution’s rules, borrowing from a court system, or writing something custom.
When parties don’t agree — or their agreement leaves gaps — the tribunal fills in. It can conduct the arbitration in whatever manner it judges appropriate, subject to the rest of the arbitration code. That default authority reaches evidentiary questions too: the tribunal decides what evidence comes in, how relevant and material it is, and how much weight it carries in the final decision.
This combination of party choice and tribunal backstop keeps international arbitration workable across parties from different legal traditions. A dispute between a company used to common-law discovery and one used to civil-law document requests doesn’t stall for lack of a shared procedural rulebook — the tribunal has the authority to bridge the gap.
Frequently Asked Questions
Can the parties choose their own arbitration procedure?
Yes — the parties are free to agree on the procedure the tribunal follows, subject to the rest of Georgia’s arbitration code.
What happens if the parties never agree on a procedure?
The arbitration tribunal may conduct the proceedings in whatever manner it considers appropriate, again subject to the code’s other provisions.
Who decides whether evidence is admissible in the arbitration?
The tribunal does — its default procedural power includes determining the admissibility, relevance, materiality, and weight of any evidence offered.
Does this section give the tribunal unlimited control over the case?
No — the tribunal’s discretion is expressly “subject to the provisions of this part,” meaning other rules in the arbitration code, such as the equal-treatment requirement, still constrain how it proceeds.
Does an agreed procedure override the tribunal’s default authority?
Yes — the tribunal’s discretion to set procedure only applies “if the parties fail to agree,” so a valid party agreement on procedure controls first.
Amendment History
Code 1981, § 9-9-41, enacted by Ga. L. 2012, p. 961, § 1/SB 383.