RulesofCivilProcedure.com Civil Procedure · Every State

§ 9-6-64.How issues of law determined; time for final determination; appeal; application to issues of fact

Chapter 6. Extraordinary Writs · Article 4. Quo Warranto · Last amended 1946 · Last verified July 17, 2026

In one sentenceWhen a quo warranto case turns only on questions of law, this section directs the superior court judge who began the case to resolve it, equity-style, within ten days of filing, and lets either side appeal that ruling; the same framework extends to jury fact cases where it can apply.

Full Text of § 9-6-64

Text sizeJump to: (a) (b)

(a) In all applications for writs of quo warranto, of informations in the nature of quo warranto, or of proceedings by such writs to determine the right to hold office, where the case presented by the applicant involves only questions of law, the same may be determined, as are equitable proceedings, by the judge of the superior court before whom the case was begun; and the judge shall so order all the proceedings connected with and usual in such cases that the final determination shall be had by him within ten days from the commencement of the action, application, or proceeding. If either party to the application or proceeding desires to except to the final decision of the judge of the superior court, he shall file an appeal as in other cases, and the duties of the clerk shall be the same as in other cases.
(b) All the provisions of subsection (a) of this Code section are extended to proceedings quo warranto, or writs of that nature, involving issues of fact to be tried by a jury, when the same can be applied; but nothing in the subsection shall be construed to affect any rights or remedies in this class of cases which are not covered thereby.

Plain-English Summary

This section splits quo warranto cases along a familiar line: questions of law versus questions of fact, and it moves fast on the former. Subsection (a) reaches applications for writs of quo warranto, informations in the nature of quo warranto, and proceedings by such writs alike. When the applicant’s case presents only legal questions, the superior court judge before whom the case began decides it, using equity-style procedure, and must reach a final determination within ten days of when the action, application, or proceeding started.

That speed does not come at the cost of appellate review. Subsection (a) preserves the right of either party to except to the judge’s final decision and file an appeal just as in other cases, with the clerk handling the appeal the same way the clerk would in any other matter.

Subsection (b) then reaches beyond pure law questions. It extends the same framework — the equity-style handling, the compressed timeline, the appeal right — to quo warranto proceedings that involve issues of fact for a jury, wherever that framework can be applied. It stops short of overriding any right or remedy in fact-based cases that the framework does not cover, leaving room for the jury procedure set out in the next section of the article.

Frequently Asked Questions

How quickly must a superior court judge reach a final determination in a quo warranto case that presents only questions of law?

Within ten days from the commencement of the action, application, or proceeding.

Who decides a quo warranto case under subsection (a) when only legal questions are involved?

The judge of the superior court before whom the case was begun.

Can a party appeal the superior court judge’s final decision in a law-question quo warranto case?

Yes. Either party may file an appeal as in other cases if they wish to except to the judge’s final decision.

Does subsection (b) apply the ten-day, law-question framework to quo warranto cases involving jury fact issues without limit?

It extends those provisions to fact-issue cases only when the same can be applied, and it does not affect rights or remedies in that class of case that the framework does not cover.

Are the clerk’s duties different in a quo warranto appeal compared to other appeals?

No. The section states that the clerk’s duties are the same as in other cases.

Amendment History

Ga. L. 1871-72, p. 41, §§ 1, 2; Code 1873, §§ 3206, 3208; Code 1882, §§ 3206, 3208; Civil Code 1895, §§ 4881, 4882; Civil Code 1910, §§ 5454, 5455; Code 1933, §§ 64-206, 64-207; Ga. L. 1946, p. 746, § 1.

Source & verification. Section text and amendment history are reproduced verbatim from the Official Code of Georgia Annotated, published by the Official Code of Georgia Annotated, Georgia Code Revision Commission / LexisNexis. Last verified July 17, 2026. · Official source
Also known as: georgia quo warranto ten day deadlinequo warranto appeal rules georgiahow fast must quo warranto case be decided georgiaquo warranto questions of law georgia