RulesofCivilProcedure.com Civil Procedure · Every State

§ 9-3-72.Foreign objects left in body

Chapter 3. Limitations of Actions · Article 4. Limitations for Malpractice Actions · Last amended 1985 · Last verified July 17, 2026

In one sentenceWhen a foreign object is left inside a patient's body, the ordinary medical malpractice periods do not apply; instead the suit must be filed within one year after the negligent act is discovered, though “foreign object” does not include a chemical compound, fixation device, or prosthetic aid or device.

Full Text of § 9-3-72

Text size

The limitations of Code Section 9-3-71 shall not apply where a foreign object has been left in a patient’s body, but in such a case an action shall be brought within one year after the negligent or wrongful act or omission is discovered. For the purposes of this Code section, the term “foreign object” shall not include a chemical compound, fixation device, or prosthetic aid or device.

Plain-English Summary

A sponge or instrument left inside a patient after surgery presents a problem the ordinary malpractice timeline handles badly: the patient often has no way to know anything went wrong until symptoms appear, which can be well after the two-year or even the five-year periods in O.C.G.A. § 9-3-71 would have run. O.C.G.A. § 9-3-72 responds with a true discovery rule for this specific situation.

Where a foreign object has been left in a patient's body, the general limitations of O.C.G.A. § 9-3-71 do not apply at all. Instead, the patient has one year from the date the negligent or wrongful act or omission is discovered to bring the action — a period that starts running only once the problem comes to light, rather than from the date of the surgery or the date of the resulting injury.

The statute narrows what counts as a “foreign object” for this purpose. It excludes a chemical compound, a fixation device, or a prosthetic aid or device. That exclusion keeps items intentionally placed in the body as part of treatment — surgical hardware, implants, and similar devices — outside this exception, reserving the one-year discovery rule for objects that were never supposed to remain in the body at all.

Frequently Asked Questions

How long do I have to sue if a surgical sponge or instrument was left inside me?

One year after the negligent or wrongful act or omission is discovered, under O.C.G.A. § 9-3-72, rather than the general two-year or five-year periods in O.C.G.A. § 9-3-71.

Does the five-year repose period in O.C.G.A. § 9-3-71 still apply to a foreign-object case?

No. This section states that the limitations of O.C.G.A. § 9-3-71 do not apply where a foreign object has been left in a patient's body.

Does a surgical implant left in my body on purpose count as a foreign object under this section?

No. The statute excludes chemical compounds, fixation devices, and prosthetic aids or devices from the definition of foreign object, so items intentionally placed as part of treatment do not trigger this one-year discovery rule.

When does the one-year clock start running for a foreign-object claim?

From the date the negligent or wrongful act or omission is discovered, not from the date of the surgery or procedure that left the object behind.

Does this foreign-object rule apply to minors or legally incompetent patients differently?

O.C.G.A. § 9-3-73(e) states that the disability rules in that section do not apply to foreign-object cases, which are governed instead by this section.

Amendment History

Code 1933, § 3-1103, enacted by Ga. L. 1976, p. 1363, § 1; Ga. L. 1985, p. 556, § 2.

Source & verification. Section text and amendment history are reproduced verbatim from the Official Code of Georgia Annotated, published by the Official Code of Georgia Annotated, Georgia Code Revision Commission / LexisNexis. Last verified July 17, 2026. · Official source
Also known as: georgia foreign object left in body statute of limitationssponge left in surgery lawsuit deadline georgiaone year discovery rule medical malpractice georgiaocga 9-3-72 explainedsurgical instrument left inside patient georgia law