§ 9-3-29.Breach of restrictive covenant
Chapter 3. Limitations of Actions · Article 2. Specific Periods of Limitation · Last amended 2017 · Last verified July 17, 2026
Full Text of § 9-3-29
Plain-English Summary
Restrictive covenants — the rules in a subdivision's or development's governing documents that limit how land can be used — depend on someone being willing and able to enforce them in time. O.C.G.A. § 9-3-29 sets that timetable at two years for most violations, including a violation of a building setback line, while giving a longer four-year period specifically to disputes over unpaid assessments or fees the covenant requires.
Subsection (c) answers the harder question of when the clock starts running. For a violation involving a permanent structure — a building encroaching on a setback line, for instance — the right of action accrues immediately when the offending fixture goes up. For violations that recur through an ongoing act or omission, the clock resets each time the violation happens again, rather than freezing at the moment of the first violation.
The section closes with a limit on its own reach: nothing here extends any separate limitations period that applies to actions in equity. A covenant dispute that also seeks equitable relief, such as an injunction, still has to satisfy whatever equitable timing rules apply on top of this statute.
Frequently Asked Questions
How long do I have to sue for breach of a restrictive covenant in Georgia?
Two years after the right of action accrues, under subsection (a), unless the violation involves unpaid assessments or fees, which get four years under subsection (b).
Does the two-year period cover a building setback line violation?
Yes. Subsection (a) specifically states that the section applies to rights of action accruing from the violation of a building setback line.
When does the clock start running for a permanent structure that violates a covenant?
Immediately upon erection of the permanent fixture that causes the violation, according to subsection (c).
What happens if the covenant violation is ongoing, like a continuing use that breaches the covenant?
The right of action accrues each time the violating act or omission occurs, so a continuous violation can restart the limitations clock repeatedly rather than being locked in at the first instance.
Does this section extend the deadline for seeking an injunction in equity over the same covenant violation?
No. Subsection (c) states that the section shall not be construed to extend any applicable statute of limitations affecting actions in equity.
Amendment History
Ga. L. 1953, Jan.-Feb. Sess., p. 238, §§ 1, 2; Ga. L. 1991, p. 665, § 1; Ga. L. 1995, p. 727, § 1; Ga. L. 2017, p. 352, § 1/SB 46.