§ 9-2-63.Affidavit of indigence for renewal of action
Chapter 2. Actions Generally · Article 4. Dismissal and Renewal · Last amended 1933 · Last verified July 17, 2026
Full Text of § 9-2-63
Plain-English Summary
Renewing a dismissed case usually comes with a price tag — the costs run up in the first case have to be paid before the plaintiff can start again. O.C.G.A. § 9-2-63 gives an indigent plaintiff a way around that cost. When any action has been dismissed or discontinued and the plaintiff wants to recommence it, filing a written affidavit with the new complaint, summons, or other proceeding opens the door to renewal without paying the accrued costs.
The affidavit has to say two specific things: that the plaintiff is advised and believes there is good cause to recommence the action, and that indigence leaves the plaintiff unable to pay the costs that built up in the earlier case. Get that affidavit on file with the papers that recommence the case, and the statute grants the right to renew without the payment that would otherwise be required.
This section has stayed on Georgia’s books since 1901, older than O.C.G.A. § 9-2-60’s five-year automatic-dismissal rule but newer than O.C.G.A. § 9-2-61’s renewal provision, which traces back to 1847. Where § 9-2-61 conditions renewal on paying the costs owed from the earlier case, this one removes that condition for a plaintiff too poor to meet it, so lack of money does not close off a claim that would otherwise still be alive.
Frequently Asked Questions
What must the affidavit say to qualify for cost-free renewal under this statute?
That the plaintiff is advised and believes there is good cause for recommencing the action, and that because of indigence the plaintiff cannot pay the costs that accrued in the earlier case.
Where does this affidavit need to be filed?
With the complaint, summons, or other proceeding the plaintiff files to recommence the action.
What does filing a valid affidavit of indigence let a plaintiff do?
Renew the dismissed or discontinued action without paying the costs that accrued in the case.
Does this statute apply to any dismissed or discontinued action, or only certain kinds?
The text applies broadly whenever any action is dismissed or discontinued and the plaintiff wants to recommence it, without limiting itself to a particular type of case.
Why would a plaintiff use this statute instead of just paying the costs and renewing under O.C.G.A. § 9-2-61?
Because indigence makes paying those costs impossible — this statute exists for a plaintiff who is unable to pay the accrued costs, letting the case be renewed anyway.
Amendment History
Ga. L. 1901, p. 80, § 1; Civil Code 1910, § 5626; Code 1933, § 3-509.