RulesofCivilProcedure.com Civil Procedure · Every State

§ 9-2-5.Prosecution of two simultaneous actions for same cause against same party prohibited; election; pendency of former action as defense; exception

Chapter 2. Actions Generally · Article 1. General Provisions · Last amended 1982 · Last verified July 17, 2026

In one sentenceO.C.G.A. § 9-2-5 bars a plaintiff from prosecuting two actions at once for the same cause of action against the same party, letting the defendant force an election between simultaneously filed suits and letting a pending earlier action serve as a defense to a later one, subject to an attachment exception.

Full Text of § 9-2-5

Text sizeJump to: (a) (b)

(a) No plaintiff may prosecute two actions in the courts at the same time for the same cause of action and against the same party. If two such actions are commenced simultaneously, the defendant may require the plaintiff to elect which he will prosecute. If two such actions are commenced at different times, the pendency of the former shall be a good defense to the latter.
(b) The rule requiring a plaintiff to elect shall not apply to a prior attachment against property where the defendant is subsequently served personally nor to an attachment obtained during the pendency of an action. However, the judgment in the case against the person shall set out the fact of its identity with the proceedings against the property.

Plain-English Summary

Suing the same person twice over the same dispute wastes the court’s time and the defendant’s money defending duplicate cases. This section stops it by prohibiting a plaintiff from prosecuting two actions at once for the same cause of action against the same party.

The remedy depends on timing. File two suits on the same claim at the same time, and the defendant can make the plaintiff choose which one to pursue. File a second suit while an earlier one on the same claim is still pending, and the pendency of the first suit becomes a defense to the second — the defendant can get the later case dismissed on that ground alone.

Subsection (b) carves out attachment proceedings. A plaintiff who first attaches a defendant’s property and later manages to serve the defendant personally doesn’t have to elect between the property proceeding and the personal action, and neither does a plaintiff who obtains an attachment while a personal action is already pending. The judgment against the person, though, has to note that it covers the same matter as the property proceeding.

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I sue the same person twice for the same claim at the same time in Georgia?

No. Subsection (a) states that no plaintiff may prosecute two actions in the courts at the same time for the same cause of action and against the same party.

What happens if I file two lawsuits over the same claim on the same day?

If two such actions are commenced simultaneously, the defendant may require the plaintiff to elect which one to prosecute.

What if I file a second lawsuit while the first one is still pending?

The pendency of the earlier action is a good defense to the later one, meaning the defendant can use the first suit’s existence to defeat the second.

Does the election rule apply to attachment actions?

Not always. Subsection (b) exempts a prior attachment against property where the defendant is later served personally, and an attachment obtained while a personal action is already pending.

If I have both a property attachment and a personal judgment, what does the judgment have to say?

The judgment in the case against the person must set out the fact of its identity with the proceedings against the property.

Amendment History

Orig. Code 1863, §§ 2835, 2836; Code 1868, §§ 2843, 2844; Code 1873, §§ 2894, 2895; Code 1882, §§ 2894, 2895; Civil Code 1895, §§ 3737, 3739; Civil Code 1910, §§ 4331, 4333; Code 1933, §§ 3-601, 3-605; Ga. L. 1982, p. 3, § 9.

Source & verification. Section text and amendment history are reproduced verbatim from the Official Code of Georgia Annotated, published by the Official Code of Georgia Annotated, Georgia Code Revision Commission / LexisNexis. Last verified July 17, 2026. · Official source
Also known as: Georgia two actions same cause prohibitedelection of remedies Georgia lawsuitpendency of prior action defense Georgiaduplicate lawsuit same defendant GeorgiaGeorgia attachment exception election rule