RulesofCivilProcedure.com Civil Procedure · Every State

§ 9-15-9.Costs when recovery on contract is less than $50.00

Chapter 15. Court and Litigation Costs · Last amended 1983 · Last verified July 17, 2026

In one sentenceO.C.G.A. § 9-15-9 caps a defendant’s cost exposure at what a magistrate court case would have cost when a superior or state court jury verdict on a contract claim comes in under $50.00, and shifts the rest of the costs to the plaintiff, collectible out of the recovery or by judgment for any shortfall.

Full Text of § 9-15-9

Text size

When any action ex contractu is brought in the superior or state court and the verdict of the jury, unreduced by setoff or payment pending the action, is for a sum under $50.00, the defendant shall not be charged with more costs than would have necessarily accrued if the case had been heard before a magistrate. The remainder of the court costs shall be paid by the plaintiff and may be retained out of the sum recovered by the plaintiff and, if that is insufficient, judgment shall be entered by the court against the plaintiff for the balance.

Plain-English Summary

This section discourages plaintiffs from pursuing small contract claims — actions “ex contractu,” meaning claims founded on a contract — in superior or state court when magistrate court could have handled them for less. When the jury’s verdict, unreduced by any setoff or payment made during the case, comes in under $50.00, the defendant can’t be charged with more costs than would have necessarily accrued had the case been heard before a magistrate.

The plaintiff picks up whatever costs the defendant is spared. The statute lets the court retain that remainder out of the sum the plaintiff recovered, and if the recovery isn’t enough to cover it, the court enters judgment against the plaintiff for the balance. The dollar figure hasn’t been adjusted since it was set, so the practical effect today is that most superior or state court contract verdicts will exceed it — but the rule still matters whenever a claim’s real value turns out to be that small.

Frequently Asked Questions

What triggers the cost cap in this section?

A jury verdict on a contract (“ex contractu”) action in superior or state court that comes in under $50.00, unreduced by any setoff or payment made during the case.

How much can the defendant be charged in costs once the cap applies?

No more than what would have necessarily accrued if the case had been heard before a magistrate.

Who pays the rest of the court costs once the cap kicks in?

The plaintiff, and the court may retain that amount out of the plaintiff’s own recovery.

What if the plaintiff’s recovery isn’t enough to cover the remaining costs?

The court enters judgment against the plaintiff for the balance.

Does this cost cap apply to personal injury or other tort verdicts?

No. It’s limited to actions ex contractu — claims founded on a contract. A separate dollar threshold applies to certain personal actions under Code Section 9-15-10.

Amendment History

Laws 1809, Cobb’s 1851 Digest, p. 505; Code 1863, § 3604; Code 1868, § 3628; Code 1873, § 3678; Code 1882, § 3678; Civil Code 1895, § 5388; Civil Code 1910, § 5983; Code 1933, § 24-3404; Ga. L. 1983, p. 884, § 4-1.

Source & verification. Section text and amendment history are reproduced verbatim from the Official Code of Georgia Annotated, published by the Official Code of Georgia Annotated, Georgia Code Revision Commission / LexisNexis. Last verified July 17, 2026. · Official source
Also known as: georgia small contract claim costsex contractu verdict under $50 georgiamagistrate court cost cap georgiageorgia contract verdict cost shifting