§ 9-13-175.Duty of officer to place purchaser in possession; which persons officer may dispossess
Chapter 13. Executions and Judicial Sales · Article 7. Judicial Sales · Last amended 1933 · Last verified July 17, 2026
Full Text of § 9-13-175
Plain-English Summary
Winning a sale and holding a deed is one thing; getting whoever occupies the property to leave is another. This section gives the purchaser a route through the selling officer rather than a separate lawsuit: once the sheriff or other officer sells real estate or a present interest in land under execution or otherwise, it becomes that officer’s duty, on application, to place the purchaser — or the purchaser’s agent or attorney — in possession.
To carry out that duty, the officer may dispossess the defendant personally, along with anyone whose claim to occupy the property traces through the defendant after the judgment attached: heirs, tenants, lessees, vendees, or assignees whose interest arose since the judgment. That last phrase matters — it limits the officer’s reach to occupants whose claim came into being after the judgment against the defendant already existed.
The statute draws a firm line at anyone who occupies under an independent title — a claim that does not derive from the defendant at all, but rests on some separate, unrelated right. The officer has no authority to dispossess that person under this section; a dispute between the purchaser and a true independent claimant has to be worked out some other way. Code Section 9-13-176 then addresses what happens if the purchaser waits too long to invoke this summary route in the first place.
Frequently Asked Questions
Once a purchaser buys real estate at a sheriff’s sale, who gets the purchaser into possession?
The selling officer, upon the purchaser’s application, has a duty to place the purchaser, or the purchaser’s agent or attorney, in possession.
Whom can the officer remove from the property to accomplish this?
The defendant, and the defendant’s heirs, tenants, lessees, vendees, or assignees whose interest arose since the judgment.
Can the officer remove someone who claims the property under a title unrelated to the defendant?
No. The statute forbids dispossessing a person claiming under an independent title.
Does the purchaser have to file a separate eviction lawsuit to get possession?
Not under this section — the officer’s duty to place the purchaser in possession on application serves as a summary route, though see Code Section 9-13-176 for the consequences of waiting too long.
Does it matter when the occupant’s claim to the property arose?
Yes. The officer’s authority reaches only occupants whose claim arose since the judgment against the defendant, not before.
Amendment History
Laws 1811, Cobb’s 1851 Digest, p. 510.; Laws 1823, Cobb’s 1851 Digest, p. 512.; Code 1863, §§ 2580, 3578; Code 1868, §§ 2582, 3601; Code 1873, §§ 2624, 3651; Code 1882, §§ 2624, 3651; Civil Code 1895, §§ 5451, 5468; Civil Code 1910, §§ 6056, 6073; Code 1933, §§ 39-1309, 39-1312.