§ 9-11-82.Jurisdiction and venue unaffected
Chapter 11. Civil Practice Act · Article 9. General Provisions · Last amended 1966 · Last verified July 17, 2026
Full Text of § 9-11-82
Plain-English Summary
This one-sentence section is a savings clause: it keeps the Civil Practice Act — a chapter about how a case proceeds — from being read to change either where a court has power to hear a case or where a case may properly be filed. It states plainly that the chapter is not to be construed to extend or limit the jurisdiction of the courts or the venue of actions.
The line matters because the Act’s procedural machinery — broad joinder rules, liberal amendment, expansive discovery — could otherwise tempt an argument that some provision implicitly enlarges a court’s reach or relaxes venue requirements. This section forecloses that argument in both directions: the chapter can’t be used to stretch jurisdiction or venue beyond what other law provides, and it can’t be used to cut off jurisdiction or venue that other law grants. Georgia’s separate venue statutes, including the provisions governing multiple codefendants in different counties, keep operating exactly as written.
Frequently Asked Questions
Can the Civil Practice Act give a Georgia court jurisdiction it wouldn’t otherwise have?
No. This section provides that the chapter is not to be construed to extend the jurisdiction of the courts.
Can the Civil Practice Act take away a court’s jurisdiction?
No. The same sentence also bars construing the chapter to limit the courts’ jurisdiction.
Does this section change where a lawsuit may properly be filed?
No. It states that the chapter does not extend or limit the venue of actions, leaving venue rules found elsewhere in Georgia law untouched.
Why does the Civil Practice Act include a section like this?
Because the chapter is a procedural code, and this section keeps it from being read to alter the separate, substantive rules that establish which courts may hear a case and where.
Does this section address both jurisdiction and venue?
Yes. It addresses both in a single sentence, leaving each untouched by the chapter’s procedural provisions.
Amendment History
Ga. L. 1966, p. 609, § 82.