§ 9-11-43.Evidence
Chapter 11. Civil Practice Act · Article 6. Trials · Last amended 1968 · Last verified July 17, 2026
Full Text of § 9-11-43
Plain-English Summary
Subsection (a) states the default for trial testimony: witnesses testify orally, in open court, unless some other provision of the chapter or another statute says otherwise. That default keeps live testimony, subject to cross-examination in front of the fact-finder, as the ordinary way evidence comes in at trial.
Subsection (b) loosens things up for motions. When a motion turns on facts outside the existing record, the court can decide it on affidavits the parties submit, or instead direct that the matter be heard wholly or partly through oral testimony or depositions. Either way, the subsection preserves a party’s separate right to use depositions whenever that right would otherwise apply.
Subsection (c) handles a different problem: proving what the law of another state or a foreign country says. A party who wants to raise such an issue has to give notice, either in the pleadings or through other reasonable written notice. Once raised, the court can look at any relevant material or source — including testimony — whether or not a party submitted it or it would ordinarily be admissible, and the court’s conclusion is treated as a ruling on a question of law rather than a factual finding for the jury.
Frequently Asked Questions
Must witnesses testify live at trial in Georgia civil cases?
Yes, ordinarily. Subsection (a) requires testimony to be taken orally in open court unless the chapter or another statute provides otherwise.
Can a Georgia court decide a motion based on affidavits alone?
Yes. When a motion rests on facts not already in the record, the court may hear it on the parties’ affidavits, though it can instead direct that the matter be heard wholly or partly on oral testimony or depositions.
How does a party raise an issue about the law of another state or country?
By giving notice in the pleadings or through other reasonable written notice.
What can the court consider when determining the law of another jurisdiction?
Any relevant material or source, including testimony, whether or not a party submitted it and whether or not it would be admissible under the ordinary rules of evidence.
Is the court’s determination of another jurisdiction’s law treated as a fact question for the jury?
No. Subsection (c) treats that determination as a ruling on a question of law.
Amendment History
Ga. L. 1966, p. 609, § 43; Ga. L. 1968, p. 1104, § 10.