Rule 71.Enforcing Relief for or Against a Nonparty
Group VIII: Provisional and Final Remedies · Last amended 2017 · Last verified July 14, 2026
Full Text of Rule 71
Comments
Rule 71 has been amended consistent with the 2007 stylistic changes to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 71.
Identical to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 71.
Plain-English Summary
Litigation usually binds only the people who are named as parties to it, but not always. An injunction can reach someone acting in concert with an enjoined defendant, or an order might direct a stakeholder or a third party holding disputed property to turn it over, even though that person never appeared in the case as a plaintiff or defendant. Rule 71 answers the practical question that follows: once a court order does grant relief for, or run against, someone outside the case, how does a party go about enforcing it?
The rule's answer is direct — the same procedure. A nonparty who benefits from an order can invoke the court's enforcement tools just as a party could, and a nonparty bound by an order is subject to the same enforcement mechanisms, whether that means the specific-act remedies in Rule 70, a writ of execution under Rule 69, or a contempt finding. Rule 71 does not expand who can be bound by a court order in the first place; it makes sure that once someone is properly subject to relief under an order, the mechanics for enforcing that order do not depend on whether the person's name appears on the case caption.
Frequently Asked Questions
Can a court order be enforced against someone who was never a party to the lawsuit?
Rule 71 addresses that situation once an order already grants relief for or against a nonparty; it provides that the order is enforced by the same procedure used for a party, though the rule does not itself decide who can be bound in the first place.
What enforcement procedure applies to a nonparty under Rule 71?
Does Rule 71 mean a nonparty can also benefit from a court order, not just be bound by one?
Yes. The rule covers both directions: an order that grants relief for a nonparty, and one that may be enforced against a nonparty, are both enforced the same way as an order involving parties.
What kinds of orders end up granting relief to or against someone who was never named as a party?
The rule does not list specific examples, but this situation typically arises when an order reaches a person closely connected to the case, such as someone bound by an injunction or holding property at issue, without that person ever having been joined as a plaintiff or defendant.
Is Rule 71 the same as its federal counterpart?
Yes. The official comment describes it as identical to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 71.