RulesofCivilProcedure.com Civil Procedure · Every State

Rule 304.Trustees, Conservators, Guardians Ad Litem, and Other Fiduciaries

Group XIV: Fiduciary Proceedings · Not amended since adoption on record · Last verified July 14, 2026

In one sentenceRule 304 requires a fiduciary to report any conflicting interest before suing or defending on a ward's behalf, limits guardian ad litem and conservator appointments largely to DC Bar members or local institutions, and bars removing a ward's assets from the District without court approval.

Full Text of Rule 304

Text sizeJump to: (a) (b) (c) (d) (e)

(a) To Report Conflicting Interest. Whenever a trustee, conservator, guardian ad litem, or other fiduciary has occasion to sue or defend in behalf of an infant or incompetent person concerning a matter in which he or she has a possible conflicting interest, he or she shall report the facts in writing to the Court so that it may take appropriate action.
(b) Guardians Ad Litem: Members of Bar to Be Appointed. Except for special cause shown no person other than a member of the bar of this court shall be appointed guardian ad litem.
(c) No guardian ad litem shall be required in the appointment of a successor fiduciary.
(d) Except for good cause shown, only a person residing within the area of the subpoena power of the court or any bank or trust institution authorized to serve in a fiduciary capacity, or a member of the bar authorized to practice law before this court, shall be appointed by the court as conservator, committee, or trustee of another.
(e) No fiduciary appointed by this Court shall, without prior Court approval, remove or maintain outside the District of Columbia any personal assets held in a fiduciary capacity.

Comment

Substantially identical to USDCDC [District Court] Rule 21.

Plain-English Summary

Rule 304 gathers several protections for people under a conservatorship or guardianship who cannot look out for themselves. If a trustee, conservator, guardian ad litem, or other fiduciary needs to sue or defend on behalf of an infant or incompetent person, and doing so creates a possible conflict with the fiduciary's own interest, Rule 304(a) requires reporting that conflict to the court in writing so the court can take appropriate action, rather than leaving the fiduciary to sort out the conflict alone.

The rule also controls who can hold these roles. Except for special cause shown, a guardian ad litem must be a member of the bar of the court, and the same is true, absent good cause, for anyone appointed conservator, committee, or trustee — who must also either reside within the court's subpoena power, be a bank or trust institution authorized to serve in a fiduciary capacity, or be a member of the bar authorized to practice before the court. One appointment is unnecessary by rule: a guardian ad litem is not required when the court is appointing a successor to a fiduciary already in place.

Rule 304(e) adds a geographic safeguard for the ward's property: a court-appointed fiduciary cannot remove personal assets held in that capacity from the District of Columbia, or keep them outside the District, without first getting the court's approval.

Frequently Asked Questions

What must a fiduciary do if a lawsuit on the ward's behalf creates a conflict with the fiduciary's own interest?

Report the facts in writing to the court so the court can take appropriate action, rather than proceeding without disclosing the conflict.

Who can serve as guardian ad litem under this rule?

Ordinarily only a member of the bar of the court, except for special cause shown.

Is a guardian ad litem always required in a conservatorship case?

No. Rule 304(c) states that no guardian ad litem is required in the appointment of a successor fiduciary.

Who can be appointed conservator, committee, or trustee?

Absent good cause, only a person residing within the area of the court's subpoena power, a bank or trust institution authorized to serve in a fiduciary capacity, or a member of the bar authorized to practice before the court.

Can a fiduciary move a ward's assets out of the District of Columbia?

Not without prior court approval — Rule 304(e) bars removing or maintaining personal assets held in a fiduciary capacity outside the District without that approval.

Source & verification. Rule text and official Comments are reproduced verbatim from the District of Columbia Superior Court Rules of Civil Procedure, adopted by the Superior Court of the District of Columbia. Last verified July 14, 2026. · Official source
Also known as: fiduciary conflict of interest dc courtwho can serve as conservator dc superior courtguardian ad litem requirement dcmoving ward assets outside dcsuccessor fiduciary guardian ad litem dc