Rule 21.Misjoinder and nonjoinder of parties
Current through January 1, 2025 · Last verified July 8, 2026
Full Text of Rule 21
Amendment History
The current West Virginia Rules of Civil Procedure took effect January 1, 2025, as part of a rewrite that modernized the rules’ numbering and structure. West Virginia does not publish a per-rule amendment history inside the compiled rules text reproduced here. The text above is verified current through the source’s own January 1, 2025 update; for the underlying adopting order and any later amendments, see the West Virginia Judiciary’s compiled rules page.
Plain-English Summary
Rule 21 delivers a short, clear message: getting the parties wrong isn't fatal to a case. If someone was joined who shouldn't have been, or someone required is missing, the fix is to add or drop that party — not to throw out the whole lawsuit.
The court can make that fix on its own or on a party's motion, at any point in the case, on terms that are just to everyone involved. The rule also lets the court sever any claim against a party into its own separate action, which can help when one claim doesn't belong with the rest of the case.
Frequently Asked Questions
Can a case be dismissed just because the wrong parties were joined?
No. Rule 21 expressly states that misjoinder of parties is not a ground for dismissing an action.
How does a court fix a misjoinder problem?
By adding or dropping a party, on motion or on its own, at any time in the case, on terms that are just to the parties involved.
Can a court split off just one claim against a party rather than the whole case?
Yes. Rule 21 lets the court sever any claim against a party into its own separate proceeding.