Rule 20.Permissive joinder of parties
Current through January 1, 2025 · Last verified July 8, 2026
Full Text of Rule 20
Amendment History
The current West Virginia Rules of Civil Procedure took effect January 1, 2025, as part of a rewrite that modernized the rules’ numbering and structure. West Virginia does not publish a per-rule amendment history inside the compiled rules text reproduced here. The text above is verified current through the source’s own January 1, 2025 update; for the underlying adopting order and any later amendments, see the West Virginia Judiciary’s compiled rules page.
Plain-English Summary
Rule 20 is about choice, not necessity — it's the counterpart to Rule 19's required joinder. Plaintiffs can join together in a single lawsuit, or multiple defendants can be joined in one, whenever their claims arise out of the same transaction, occurrence, or series of transactions, and a question of law or fact common to all of them will come up in the case.
Neither a plaintiff nor a defendant has to be interested in every bit of relief the lawsuit seeks. The court can enter judgment for some plaintiffs and against some defendants without requiring everyone joined to win or lose together.
Joining multiple parties can create friction — a defendant with no real connection to a co-defendant's dispute might be embarrassed or burdened by being lumped into the same case. Rule 20(b) gives the court a release valve: it can order separate trials or other protective measures to shield a party from delay, expense, or other prejudice caused by parties against whom it has no claim and who have no claim against it.
Frequently Asked Questions
When can multiple plaintiffs join together in one lawsuit?
When their claims arise out of the same transaction, occurrence, or series of transactions, and a question of law or fact common to all of them will arise in the action.
Do all the joined defendants have to be liable for the same amount?
No. The court can grant judgment to one or more plaintiffs according to their own rights, and against one or more defendants according to their own liabilities — joinder doesn't require an all-or-nothing outcome.
What if joining several defendants together creates unfair prejudice to one of them?
The court can order separate trials or other protective measures under Rule 20(b) to shield a party from embarrassment, delay, expense, or other prejudice caused by being joined with parties it has no real dispute with.