RulesofCivilProcedure.com Civil Procedure · Every State

813.126.New hearing or petition for review.

Ch. 813: Injunctions, Ne Exeat and Receivers · Last amended 2021 · Last verified July 15, 2026

In one sentenceSection 813.126 lets a party get a judge to redo, from scratch, a court commissioner’s ruling in a domestic abuse, child abuse, individuals-at-risk, or harassment case if the party moves within 30 days, and lets a respondent seek review of a permanent injunction whenever the conviction behind it is vacated.

Full Text of Section 813.126

Text sizeJump to: (1) (2)

(1) TIME LIMITS FOR DE NOVO HEARING. If a party seeks to have the judge conduct a hearing de novo under s. 757.69 (8) of a determination, order, or ruling entered by a court commissioner in an action under s. 813.12, 813.122, 813.123, or 813.125, including a denial of a request for a temporary restraining order, the motion requesting the hearing must be filed with the court within 30 days after the circuit court commissioner issued the determination, order, or ruling. The court shall hold the de novo hearing within 30 days after the motion requesting the hearing is filed with the court unless the court finds good cause for an extension. Any determination, order, or ruling entered by a court commissioner in an action under s. 813.12, 813.122, 813.123, or 813.125 remains in effect until the judge in the de novo hearing issues his or her final determination, order, or ruling. (1m) HEARING TO REVIEW A PERMANENT INJUNCTION. If a respondent’s criminal conviction that formed the basis for a permanent injunction in an action under s. 813.12, 813.122, 813.123, or 813.125 has been vacated, the respondent may file a motion requesting a hearing to review the injunction. The court shall hold the review hearing within 30 days after the motion requesting the hearing is filed with the court unless the court finds good cause for an extension. At the hearing, if the judge finds that the conviction that formed the basis for the permanent injunction has been vacated, the judge shall modify the duration of the injunction or vacate the injunction. In so modifying or vacating the injunction, the judge shall consider all relevant factors, including the risk to the petitioner and the time that has passed since the injunction was ordered. No modified injunction ordered under this subsection may be in effect for a longer period than the maximum period that would have been possible when the injunction was first ordered if the injunction had not been permanent. If the maximum possible period from the time the injunction was first ordered has elapsed, the judge shall vacate the injunction.
(2) NOTICE. The clerk of circuit court shall provide notice of a motion under sub. (1) or (1m) to the nonmoving party. This subsection does not apply to a motion to review a denial of a temporary restraining order.

Plain-English Summary

Many domestic abuse, child abuse, individuals-at-risk, and harassment orders start with a ruling from a court commissioner, and section 813.126 gives a party a path to have a judge take a fresh look. A motion requesting a de novo hearing on a commissioner’s determination, order, or ruling — including a denial of a temporary restraining order request — must be filed within 30 days after the commissioner acted. The court must then hold that hearing within 30 days after the motion is filed, absent good cause for an extension, and the commissioner’s determination remains in effect until the judge issues a final ruling.

The section also addresses what happens to a permanent injunction after the fact. If the criminal conviction that formed the basis for a permanent injunction under one of the covered sections is later vacated, the respondent may move for a hearing to review the injunction, and the court must hold that hearing within 30 days absent good cause for an extension. If the judge finds the conviction has indeed been vacated, the judge must modify the injunction’s duration or vacate it outright, weighing the risk to the petitioner and the time that has passed. Any modified injunction cannot run longer than the maximum term that would have been available at the outset had the injunction never been permanent, and if that maximum period has already elapsed, the judge must vacate the injunction.

Notice to the nonmoving party is required for a motion under either provision, with one exception: a motion to review the denial of a temporary restraining order does not require that notice.

Frequently Asked Questions

How long do I have to ask a judge to redo a court commissioner’s restraining order decision?

30 days after the commissioner issued the determination, order, or ruling.

Does the commissioner’s order stay in place while I wait for the judge’s de novo hearing?

Yes. It remains in effect until the judge issues a final determination, order, or ruling.

Can a permanent injunction be reviewed later?

Yes, if the criminal conviction that formed its basis has been vacated, the respondent may move for a hearing to review the injunction.

What can the judge do at that review hearing?

Modify the injunction’s duration or vacate it, considering the risk to the petitioner and the time since the injunction was ordered, and the modified term cannot exceed what the maximum non-permanent term would have been.

Will the other party be notified about my motion?

Yes, except a motion to review a denial of a temporary restraining order does not require notice to the nonmoving party.

Amendment History

History: 2009 a. 262; 2013 a. 322; 2015 a. 349; 2021 a. 256.

Source & verification. Section text and official notes are reproduced verbatim from the Wisconsin Statutes, published by the Wisconsin Legislature (Legislative Reference Bureau). Last verified July 15, 2026. · Official source
Also known as: wisconsin de novo hearing restraining orderreview permanent injunction vacated conviction wisconsinappeal court commissioner restraining order wisconsin813.126 wisconsin injunction review