812.14.Answer conclusive if no reply by plaintiff; procedure following reply.
Ch. 812: Garnishment · Last amended 1975 · Last verified July 15, 2026
Full Text of Section 812.14
Plain-English Summary
Section 812.14 gives the garnishee’s answer real weight. Once filed, it is taken as true unless the plaintiff serves a reply on the garnishee within 20 days of receiving it. Silence from the plaintiff within that window locks in whatever the garnishee disclosed, for better or worse from the plaintiff’s perspective.
If the plaintiff does reply, the section shifts the case onto an adversarial track. Serving the reply joins issue between the plaintiff and the garnishee, and from there the two proceed the way parties do in any ordinary civil action, with pleadings, evidence, and argument over what the garnishee owes or holds. The section closes with a procedural rule specific to this kind of dispute: whatever issue emerges between the plaintiff and the garnishee is tried to the court, not to a jury.
Frequently Asked Questions
What happens if the plaintiff never responds to the garnishee’s answer?
Section 812.14(1) says the answer is taken as true if the plaintiff does not serve a reply within 20 days after receiving it.
What does the plaintiff have to do to challenge the garnishee’s answer?
Serve a reply on the garnishee within that 20-day window; doing so joins issue and moves the dispute forward like an ordinary civil action.
Does a jury decide disputes between the plaintiff and the garnishee?
No. Section 812.14(3) specifies that trial of a garnishment issue is to the court.
What happens procedurally once the plaintiff files a reply?
Under Section 812.14(2), issue is joined between the plaintiff and the garnishee, and the parties proceed as in ordinary civil actions from that point forward.
Is there a downside to a plaintiff waiting too long to reply to a garnishee’s answer?
Yes. If the plaintiff misses the 20-day window, the garnishee’s answer is taken as true, without the plaintiff getting a chance to contest it.
Amendment History
History: Sup. Ct. Order, 67 Wis. 2d 585, 759 (1975); Stats. 1975 s. 812.14.