Part Four: Pretrial Procedures, Dispositions and Production at Trial · Last amended 2021 · Last verified July 16, 2026
In one sentenceRule 4:11 lets a party serve written requests asking another party to admit the truth of facts, the application of law to fact, or the genuineness of documents; each request is deemed admitted unless answered or objected to within 21 or 28 days, and an admission is conclusively established for the case.
(a)Request for Admission. — A party may serve upon any other party a written request for the admission, for purposes of the pending action only, of the truth of any matters within the scope of Rule 4:1(b) set forth in the request that relate to statements or opinions of fact or of the application of law to fact, including the genuineness of any documents described in the request. Copies of documents must be served with the request unless they have been or are otherwise furnished or made available for inspection and copying. The request may, without leave of court, be served upon the plaintiff after commencement of the action and upon any other party with or after service of the complaint upon that party.
Each matter of which an admission is requested must be separately set forth. The matter is admitted unless, within 21 days after service of the request, or within such shorter or longer time as the court may allow, the party to whom the request is directed serves upon the party requesting the admission a written answer or objection addressed to the matter, signed by the party or by his attorney, but, unless the court shortens the time, a defendant is not required to serve answers or objections before the expiration of 28 days after service of the complaint upon him. If objection is made, the reasons therefor must be stated. The answer must specifically deny the matter or set forth in detail the reasons why the answering party cannot truthfully admit or deny the matter. A denial must fairly meet the substance of the requested admission, and when good faith requires that a party qualify his answer or deny only a part of the matter of which an admission is requested, he must specify so much of it as is true and qualify or deny the remainder. An answering party may not give lack of information or knowledge as a reason for failure to admit or deny unless he states that he has made reasonable inquiry and that the information known or readily obtainable by him is insufficient to enable him to admit or deny. A party who considers that a matter of which an admission has been requested presents a genuine issue for trial may not, on that ground alone, object to the request; he may, subject to the provisions of Rule 4:12(c), deny the matter or set forth reasons why he cannot admit or deny it.
The party who has requested the admissions may move to determine the sufficiency of the answers or objections. Unless the court determines that an objection is justified, it will order that an answer be served. If the court determines that an answer does not comply with the requirements of this Rule, it may order either that the matter is admitted or that an amended answer be served. The court may, in lieu of these orders, determine that final disposition of the request be made at a pretrial conference or at a designated time prior to trial. The provisions of Rule 4:12(a)(4) apply to the award of expenses incurred in relation to the motion.
(b)Effect of Admission. — Any matter admitted under this Rule is conclusively established unless the court on motion permits withdrawal or amendment of the admission. Subject to the provisions of Rule 4:13 governing amendment of a pretrial order, the court may permit withdrawal or amendment when the presentation of the merits of the action will be subserved thereby and the party who obtained the admission fails to satisfy the court that withdrawal or amendment will prejudice him in maintaining his action or defense on the merits. Any admission made by a party under this Rule is for the purpose of the pending action only and is not an admission by him for any other purpose nor may it be used against him in any other proceeding.
(c)Filing. — Except as provided in Rules 3:3 and 1:17, requests for admissions and answers or objections should be served and filed as provided in Rule 4:8.
(d)Part of Record. — Only such requests for admissions and the answers thereto as are offered in evidence become a part of the record.
(1)Requests for admission not related to genuineness of documents. Unless all parties agree, or the court grants leave for good cause shown, no party may serve upon any other party, at any one time or cumulatively, more than 30 requests for admission, including all parts and subparts, that do not relate to the genuineness of documents. Leave to propound additional requests should be liberally granted in the interests of justice.
(2)Requests for admission relating to the genuineness of documents. The number of requests for admissions relating to the genuineness of documents will not be limited unless the court enters a protective order pursuant to the provisions of Rule 4:1(c) upon a finding that justice so requires in order to protect the responding party from unwarranted annoyance, embarrassment, oppression, or undue burden or expense.
Plain-English Summary
Rule 4:11 narrows a case by forcing an opponent to commit, in writing, to what it will and will not contest. A party may serve requests asking another party to admit, for purposes of that case only, the truth of facts, the application of law to fact, or the genuineness of specific documents, with copies of the documents attached unless already available. Each matter must be set out separately, and there is no need for leave of court to serve the requests.
A matter is deemed admitted automatically unless the responding party serves a written answer or objection within 21 days — 28 days for a defendant responding after the complaint. An answer must specifically deny the matter or explain in detail why the party can neither admit nor deny it; a party who can truthfully admit part and must deny the rest has to say so and qualify accordingly. Lack of knowledge is not an acceptable excuse unless the responding party states it made reasonable inquiry and still could not get enough information to answer. A party cannot object merely because a matter presents a genuine issue for trial — it has to deny the request or explain why it cannot. If the requesting party thinks the answers are inadequate, it may move the court to determine their sufficiency, and the court can order a better answer or deem the matter admitted.
Whatever gets admitted, by answer or by default, is conclusively established for the case unless the court permits it to be withdrawn or amended under the standard that governs amending a pretrial order — generally, when doing so serves the merits and does not prejudice the party who obtained the admission. An admission binds the answering party only in that action; it cannot be used against that party anywhere else. Only requests and answers offered in evidence become part of the record. Absent agreement or a showing of good cause, a party may serve no more than 30 requests unrelated to document genuineness, though leave to serve more is granted liberally; requests aimed at authenticating documents carry no numerical limit at all, unless a protective order says otherwise.
Frequently Asked Questions
What happens if you do not respond to a request for admission in Virginia?
The matter is deemed admitted automatically after 21 days (28 days for a defendant responding after the complaint), unless you serve a written answer or objection in time (Rule 4:11(a)).
Can you object to a request for admission just because it raises a disputed issue?
No. Rule 4:11(a) says a party cannot object on that ground alone — it must deny the matter or explain in detail why it cannot admit or deny it.
How binding is an admission made under Rule 4:11?
It is conclusively established for the pending action unless the court permits withdrawal or amendment, but it has no effect outside that case and cannot be used against the admitting party in any other proceeding (Rule 4:11(b)).
How many requests for admission can a party serve in Virginia?
No more than 30 that do not relate to document genuineness, absent agreement or leave of court for good cause; requests aimed at authenticating documents have no numerical limit (Rule 4:11(e)).
Can lack of information excuse a failure to admit or deny a request?
Only if the party states it made a reasonable inquiry and that the information it could reasonably obtain is still not enough to admit or deny (Rule 4:11(a)).
Amendment History
Last amended by Order dated November 23, 2020; effective March 1, 2021.
Source & verification. Rule text and amendment history are
reproduced verbatim from the Rules of Supreme Court of Virginia, published by the
Supreme Court of Virginia. Last verified July 16, 2026.
· Official source
Also known as:RFArequest for admission virginiadeemed admitted virginiaadmit or deny discovery virginiavirginia rule 4:11