Rule 2:804.HEARSAY EXCEPTIONS APPLICABLE WHERE THE DECLARANT IS
Part Two: Virginia Rules of Evidence · Last amended 2021 · Last verified July 16, 2026
In one sentenceRule 2:804 lists the hearsay exceptions that apply only when the declarant is dead or unavailable — former testimony with an adequate opportunity to cross-examine, dying declarations in homicide cases, statements against the declarant’s own interest, statements of family history, and statements by a party incapable of testifying under Code § 8.01-397.
UNAVAILABLE (Rule 2:804(b)(5) derived from Code § 8.01-397).
(a)Applicability. The hearsay exceptions set forth in subpart (b) hereof are applicable where the declarant is dead or otherwise unavailable as a witness.
(b)Hearsay exceptions. The following are not excluded by the hearsay rule: (1) Former testimony. Testimony given under oath or otherwise subject to penalties for
perjury at a prior hearing, or in a deposition, if it is offered in reasonably accurate form and, if given in a different proceeding, the party against whom the evidence is now of fered, or in a civil case a privy, was a party in that proceeding who examined the witness by direct examination or had the opportunity to cross-examine the witness, and the issue on which the testimony is offered is substantially the same in the two cases.
(2)Statement under belief of impending death. In a prosecution for homicide, a state m e nt made by a declarant who believed when the statement was made that death was imminent and who had given up all hope of survival, concerning the cause or circumstances of declarant's impending death.
(3)Statement against interest. (A) A statement which the declarant knew at the time of its making to be contrary to the declarant's pecuniary or proprietary interest, or to tend to subje c t the declarant to civil liability. (B) A statement which the declarant knew at the time of its making would tend to subject the declarant to criminal liability, if the statement is shown to be reliable.
(4)Statement of personal or family history. If no better evidence is available, a statement made before the existence of the controversy, concerning family relationships or pedigree of a person, made by a member of the family or relative.
(5)Statement by party incapable of testifying. Code § 8.01-397, entitled "Corroboration required and evidence receivable when one party incapable of testifying," presently provides:
In an action by or against a person who, from any cause, is incapable of testifying, or by or against the committee, trustee, executor, administrator, heir, or other representative of the person so incapable of testifying, no judgment or decree may be rendered in favor of an adverse or interested party founded on his uncorroborated testimony. In any such action, whether such adverse party testifies or not, all entries, memoranda, and declarations by the party so incapable of testifying made while he was capable, relevant to the matter in issue, may be received as evidence in all proceedings including without limitation those to which a person under a disability is a party. The
phrase "from any cause" as used in this section does not include situations in which the party who is incapable of testifying has rendered himself unable to testify by an intentional self-inflicted injury.
For the purposes of this section, and in addition to corroboration by any other competent evidence, an entry authored by an adverse or interested party contained in a business record may be competent evidence for corroboration of the testimony of an adverse or interested party. If authentication of the business record is not admitted in a request for admission, such business record may be authenticated by a person other than the author of the entry who is not an adverse or interested party whose conduct is at issue in the allegations of the complaint.
Plain-English Summary
Rule 2:804 gathers the hearsay exceptions that come into play only when the declarant cannot be produced. Subdivision (a) states the threshold: these exceptions apply where the declarant is dead or otherwise unavailable as a witness, unlike the Rule 2:803 exceptions, which apply regardless of availability.
Subdivision (b) lists five recognized exceptions. Former testimony admits testimony given under oath, or otherwise subject to penalties for perjury, at a prior hearing or deposition, if offered in reasonably accurate form and if the party against whom it is now offered (or, in a civil case, a privy) was a party in that earlier proceeding who examined the witness on direct or had the opportunity to cross-examine, with the issue in both cases substantially the same. A statement under belief of impending death — the dying declaration — applies in homicide prosecutions, admitting a statement about the cause or circumstances of the declarant’s death made by someone who believed death was imminent and had given up all hope of survival.
A statement against interest covers two variations: a statement the declarant knew, at the time it was made, was contrary to the declarant’s own pecuniary or proprietary interest or tended to subject the declarant to civil liability; and a statement the declarant knew would tend to subject the declarant to criminal liability, admissible only if shown to be reliable. A statement of personal or family history admits, when no better evidence is available, a statement about family relationships or pedigree made before the controversy existed, by a member of the family or a relative.
The fifth exception, statement by a party incapable of testifying, incorporates Code § 8.01-397 by reproducing its text: no judgment may rest on a party’s uncorroborated testimony in an action by or against someone incapable of testifying (or that person’s representative), but entries, memoranda, and declarations made by the incapable party while capable, relevant to the matter, may be received as evidence — with an exclusion for someone who made himself incapable of testifying through an intentional self-inflicted injury. The rule adds that an entry authored by an adverse or interested party in a business record can corroborate that party’s testimony, and if not authenticated through a request for admission, it may be authenticated by a non-adverse, non-interested person other than the entry’s author.
Frequently Asked Questions
When do the hearsay exceptions in Rule 2:804 apply?
Only where the declarant is dead or otherwise unavailable as a witness, per Rule 2:804(a) — unlike Rule 2:803’s exceptions, which apply regardless of availability.
What is required to admit former testimony under Rule 2:804?
The testimony must have been given under oath or subject to penalties for perjury at a prior hearing or deposition, offered in reasonably accurate form, with the party against whom it’s now offered (or a privy in a civil case) having examined or had the opportunity to cross-examine the witness in a proceeding raising substantially the same issue.
When does the dying declaration exception apply?
Rule 2:804(b)(2) limits it to homicide prosecutions, admitting a statement about the cause or circumstances of the declarant’s impending death, made by a declarant who believed death was imminent and had given up all hope of survival.
What are the two forms of statement against interest under Rule 2:804?
One where the declarant knew the statement was contrary to the declarant’s pecuniary or proprietary interest or would create civil liability, and another where the declarant knew it would create criminal liability — the criminal-liability version is admissible only if shown to be reliable.
How does Rule 2:804 treat testimony from a party who is incapable of testifying?
It incorporates Code § 8.01-397, barring a judgment based on that party’s uncorroborated testimony, while allowing the party’s own prior entries, memoranda, and declarations made while capable to serve as corroborating evidence, including certain business-record entries.
Amendment History
Last amended by Order dated November 13, 2020; effective July 1, 2021.
Source & verification. Rule text and amendment history are
reproduced verbatim from the Rules of Supreme Court of Virginia, published by the
Supreme Court of Virginia. Last verified July 16, 2026.
· Official source
Also known as:unavailable declarant hearsay exception virginiadying declaration virginia rulestatement against interest hearsay virginiarule 2:804 virginia evidenceformer testimony exception virginia court