Rule 1:1C.Jurisdictional Transfer During Appeal of Interlocutory Orders.
Part One: General Rules Applicable to All Proceedings · Last amended 2026 · Last verified September 26, 2026
Full Text of Rule 1:1C
Plain-English Summary
Rule 1:1C is the interlocutory-order companion to Rule 1:1B, which covers appeals from final and partial final judgments. It applies when a party seeks an appeal from an interlocutory order under one of the provisions it names: Code §§ 8.01-626, 8.01-670.2 and 8.01-670.3, and Code § 17.1-405(A)(4) and (A)(5).
Once that appeal is sought, jurisdiction splits. The appellate court has exclusive jurisdiction over the interlocutory order on appeal. The circuit court keeps jurisdiction over every part of the case that has not been appealed, so the rest of the litigation can move forward. That default holds unless the circuit court or the appellate court enters an order staying the circuit court proceedings.
Because the appellate court’s hold on the order is exclusive, the rule supplies a way back to the trial judge. On a party’s motion, and for good cause shown, the appellate court may permit the circuit court to withdraw or modify the order.
An earlier version of the rule treated a petition for review under Code § 8.01-626 differently from other interlocutory appeals, leaving the circuit court with concurrent jurisdiction over the whole case in the others. The current text applies one division to every appeal it lists.
Frequently Asked Questions
Does appealing an interlocutory order halt the circuit court case?
Not by itself. Under Rule 1:1C the circuit court keeps jurisdiction over every part of the case that hasn’t been appealed. Only a stay order, entered by the circuit court or the appellate court, stops those proceedings.
Which interlocutory appeals does Rule 1:1C cover?
Appeals sought under Code §§ 8.01-626, 8.01-670.2, 8.01-670.3, 17.1-405(A)(4) and 17.1-405(A)(5). The rule names those provisions and no others.
Can the circuit court change an interlocutory order while the appeal is pending?
Only with permission. The appellate court has exclusive jurisdiction over the order on appeal, but on a party’s motion and for good cause shown it may permit the circuit court to withdraw or modify the order.
How does Rule 1:1C differ from Rule 1:1B?
Rule 1:1B governs jurisdiction after an appeal from a final or partial final judgment. Rule 1:1C governs jurisdiction after an appeal is sought from an interlocutory order under the provisions it lists.
Does the rule still treat a petition for review under Code § 8.01-626 differently from other interlocutory appeals?
No. An earlier version did: it gave the appellate court exclusive jurisdiction over the order only for a § 8.01-626 petition and left the circuit court with concurrent jurisdiction over the whole case in other interlocutory appeals. The current rule applies the same division to every appeal it lists.
Amendment History
Promulgated by Order dated July 2, 2019; effective September 1, 2019. Last amended by Order dated July 17, 2026; effective September 15, 2026.