RulesofCivilProcedure.com Civil Procedure · Every State

§ 8.01-42.6.Liability of employer for personal injury or death by wrongful act.

Chapter 3. Actions · Article 3. Injury to Person or Property · Last amended 2025 · Last verified July 16, 2026

In one sentenceA 2025 addition letting a “vulnerable victim” — a patient, a person under legal disability, an assisted-living resident, a transportation passenger, or a spa or massage-therapy customer — hold an employer vicariously liable for an employee’s tortious conduct by proving the employer failed to prevent or control an employee it knew it needed to supervise.

Full Text of § 8.01-42.6

Text sizeJump to: (A) (B) (C)

A. In addition to any other available grounds for the determination of the course and scope of employment, in an action for personal injury or death by wrongful act brought by a vulnerable victim or the personal representative of a deceased vulnerable victim against an employee, the finder of fact at trial on the merits shall determine whether an employer shall be vicariously liable for the tortious conduct of such employer's employee based upon a finding that:
1. The employee's tortious conduct occurred while the employee was reasonably likely to be in contact with the vulnerable victim and such conduct proximately causes personal injury to such vulnerable victim or the death of such vulnerable victim by wrongful act;
2. The employer failed to exercise reasonable care to (i) prevent the employee from intentionally harming such vulnerable victim or (ii) control the employee resulting in an unreasonable risk of a vulnerable victim suffering personal injury or death by wrongful act;
3. The employer knew or should have known of the ability to control the employee; and
4. The employer knew or should have known of the necessity and opportunity for exercising such control over the employee.
B. For the purposes of this section, "vulnerable victim" means any person who is at a substantial disadvantage relative to an employee due to circumstances, including such person's physical or mental condition or characteristics, and, as a matter of law, shall include a (i) patient of a health care provider, as defined in § 8.01-581.1; (ii) person under a disability pursuant to § 8.01-2; (iii) resident of an assisted living facility; (iv) passenger of a common carrier, as defined in § 46.2-2000, excluding those transit services and transit facilities under the Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority Compact of 1966 pursuant to Chapter 31 (§ 33.2-3100) of Title 33.2; (v) passenger of a common carrier, as defined in § 46.2-2000, excluding public transit agencies funded in whole or in part by the Commonwealth Mass Transit Fund, as defined in § 33.2-1526; (vi) passenger of a nonemergency medical transportation carrier, as defined in § 46.2-2000; and (vii) business invitee of an esthetics spa, as defined in § 54.1- 700, or a business offering massage therapy, as defined in § 54.1-3000.
C. The determination of the issues pursuant to the provisions of this section shall be questions of fact for which the plaintiff shall bear the burden of proof and shall be subject to any available affirmative defenses.

Plain-English Summary

Subsection A supplies an additional path to employer vicarious liability alongside traditional course-and-scope-of-employment doctrine, tailored to situations where an employee harms someone especially vulnerable to that employee. In an action for personal injury or death by wrongful act brought by a vulnerable victim, or the personal representative of a deceased vulnerable victim, against an employee, the finder of fact determines whether the employer is vicariously liable based on four findings: that the employee’s tortious conduct occurred while reasonably likely to bring the employee into contact with the vulnerable victim and proximately caused the injury or death; that the employer failed to exercise reasonable care to prevent the employee from intentionally harming the victim or to control the employee, resulting in an unreasonable risk of harm; that the employer knew or should have known of its ability to control the employee; and that the employer knew or should have known of the necessity and opportunity for exercising that control.

Subsection B defines “vulnerable victim” as anyone at a substantial disadvantage relative to an employee because of circumstances such as physical or mental condition, and as a matter of law includes a patient of a health care provider, a person under a disability under § 8.01-2, a resident of an assisted living facility, several categories of common-carrier passengers (with exclusions for certain transit services), a passenger of a nonemergency medical transportation carrier, and a business invitee of an esthetics spa or a massage-therapy business.

Subsection C makes the four findings questions of fact, places the burden of proof on the plaintiff, and leaves the employer free to raise any available affirmative defenses.

Frequently Asked Questions

Who qualifies as a “vulnerable victim” under this section?

As a matter of law, the category includes a patient of a health care provider, a person under a legal disability, a resident of an assisted living facility, several categories of common-carrier and nonemergency medical transportation passengers, and a business invitee of an esthetics spa or massage-therapy business, along with anyone else at a substantial disadvantage relative to an employee because of physical or mental condition or similar circumstances.

What does a plaintiff have to prove to hold an employer vicariously liable under this section?

Four things: that the employee’s tortious conduct arose from reasonably likely contact with the vulnerable victim and proximately caused injury or death; that the employer failed to reasonably prevent or control the employee; that the employer knew or should have known of its ability to control the employee; and that the employer knew or should have known of the necessity and opportunity to do so.

Does this section replace the ordinary course-and-scope-of-employment test for employer liability?

No. Subsection A states it operates in addition to any other available grounds for determining the course and scope of employment.

Are all bus and rideshare passengers covered as “vulnerable victims”?

The definition reaches several categories of common-carrier passengers, but it excludes certain transit services, including Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority transit services and, separately, public transit agencies funded by the Commonwealth Mass Transit Fund.

Who has the burden of proving these elements, and can the employer still defend itself?

The plaintiff bears the burden of proof on the four factual findings, and the employer remains free to raise any available affirmative defenses.

Amendment History

2025, cc. 726, 727.

Source & verification. Section text and amendment history are reproduced verbatim from the Code of Virginia, published by the Code of Virginia, Virginia Division of Legislative Automated Systems. Last verified July 16, 2026. · Official source
Also known as: virginia vulnerable victim employer liability8.01-42.6 vicarious liability employee misconductemployer liable for employee sexual assault virginiava code vulnerable victim vicarious liability 2025nursing home caregiver assault employer liability virginia