§ 8.01-341.2.Deferral or limitation of jury service for particular occupational inconvenience or for persons who have legal custody and are responsible for a child.
Chapter 11. Juries · Article 2. Jurors · Last amended 2019 · Last verified July 16, 2026
Full Text of § 8.01-341.2
Plain-English Summary
Jury duty does not have to collide head-on with a person’s job or family obligations. This section lets a court excuse or limit someone’s service for a single term of court, or narrow it to particular dates within that term, when serving would cause a genuine occupational inconvenience.
The section names two examples: a full-time student attending classes during the term, and a parent or guardian with sole responsibility for a child 16 or younger who needs continuous care during court hours. Either the juror or the court itself can raise the issue.
This is deferral, not forgiveness — the obligation to serve carries over to the next term after the inconvenience ends. And it does not crowd out the separate custody-based exemption available on request under subdivision 8 of § 8.01-341.1, which a qualifying caregiver can still use instead.
Frequently Asked Questions
Does this section let a person skip jury duty entirely?
No. Service selected for is only deferred until the term of court next after the particular occupational inconvenience ends.
Does being a full-time college student qualify as an occupational inconvenience?
Yes, if the person is enrolled as a full-time student at an accredited institution and is attending classes during the term of jury service.
Can a court limit jury service to specific dates instead of exempting a person entirely?
Yes. The court may limit that person’s service to particular dates of the term rather than excusing the person entirely.
Who can raise the issue of occupational inconvenience — only the juror?
No. The court, at the request of a person selected for jury service or on its own motion, may grant this relief.
How does this section interact with the child-custody exemption in § 8.01-341.1?
This section does not interfere with the exemption available under subdivision 8 of § 8.01-341.1, so a qualifying caregiver keeps that separate option.
Amendment History
1981, c. 108; 1987, c. 155; 2018, c. 259; 2019, c. 518.