§ 8.01-233.When action deemed brought on counterclaim or cross-claim; when statute of limitations tolled; defendant's consent required for dismissal.
Chapter 4. Limitations of Actions · Article 1. In General · Last amended 1977 · Last verified July 16, 2026
Full Text of § 8.01-233
Plain-English Summary
Section 8.01-233 solves a timing problem that comes up whenever a defendant wants to fight back with its own claim instead of just defending. Subsection A establishes that a defendant who pleads a counterclaim or cross-claim is deemed to have brought an action as of the date that pleading is filed — the same way a plaintiff is deemed to have sued when the complaint is filed.
Subsection B then gives defendants real protection against a limitations period that might otherwise have expired by the time they get around to filing. If the counterclaim or cross-claim arises out of the same transaction or occurrence as the plaintiff’s claim, the statute of limitations on that pleading is tolled from the moment the plaintiff commenced the action. That means a defendant facing a claim over, say, a car accident or a contract dispute does not lose the ability to assert a related counterclaim just because the plaintiff waited until near the end of the limitations period to sue and the defendant’s own claim would otherwise be time-barred by the time an answer is due.
Frequently Asked Questions
When is a counterclaim or cross-claim treated as “filed” for statute of limitations purposes?
Section 8.01-233(A) deems the defendant to have brought an action on the date the counterclaim or cross-claim is filed as a pleading.
Does filing a lawsuit toll the statute of limitations on the defendant’s related counterclaim?
Yes, if the counterclaim arises out of the same transaction or occurrence as the plaintiff’s claim. Section 8.01-233(B) tolls the statute of limitations on that counterclaim from the commencement of the plaintiff’s action.
What happens if a counterclaim arises from a completely different transaction than the plaintiff’s claim?
The tolling provision in subsection B does not apply, because it only reaches counterclaims and cross-claims arising out of the same transaction or occurrence as the plaintiff’s claim.
Can a defendant assert a counterclaim even if the underlying limitations period would otherwise have expired by the time the answer is filed?
Section 8.01-233 makes that possible for a related counterclaim, because the tolling under subsection B reaches back to when the plaintiff’s action was commenced, not when the counterclaim is later filed.
Does this section apply to cross-claims between co-defendants, or only to counterclaims against the plaintiff?
It applies to both. Section 8.01-233 refers throughout to a defendant who pleads either a counterclaim or a cross-claim.
Amendment History
Code 1950, § 8-244; 1954, c. 611; 1977, c. 617.