§ 8.01-227.5.Persons who may bring action; persons against whom actions may be brought; damages recoverable.
Chapter 3. Actions · Article 23. Drug Dealer Liability Act · Last amended 2002 · Last verified July 16, 2026
Full Text of § 8.01-227.5
Plain-English Summary
Subsection A gives a parent or legal custodian standing to sue over their own child’s unlawful use of a controlled substance while the child was under eighteen. The defendant must be a natural person, eighteen or older, who sold, administered, furnished, or knowingly took part in unlawfully distributing the drug to the child. That is a narrow target: Article 23 does not reach every dealer operating in a community, only the specific adult tied to a specific child’s drug use.
Subsection B limits what the parent can collect. Recoverable damages are confined to physical and emotional pain and suffering, the cost of treatment and rehabilitation, and medical expenses — and only those proximately caused by the child’s unlawful drug use. The statute compensates the parent or custodian for the fallout of the child’s addiction, not for a broader set of harms.
Frequently Asked Questions
Who can bring a lawsuit under Virginia’s Drug Dealer Liability Act?
A parent or legal custodian, for damages arising from their own child’s unlawful use of a controlled substance while the child was under eighteen.
Who can be sued under § 8.01-227.5?
A natural person eighteen or older who sold, administered, furnished, or knowingly took part in the unlawful distribution of a controlled substance to the child — not a corporation or other entity acting on its own.
What damages can a parent recover in this kind of lawsuit?
Physical and emotional pain and suffering, the cost of treatment and rehabilitation, and medical expenses, but only to the extent these were proximately caused by the child’s unlawful use of a controlled substance.
Can a parent sue over drug distribution to someone else’s child?
No. Standing under § 8.01-227.5 runs to a parent or legal custodian suing over their own child’s unlawful use, not a child generally.
Does the defendant have to be the one who directly sold the drug to the child?
Not necessarily. Liability reaches anyone eighteen or older who sold, administered, or furnished the substance, or who knowingly participated in its unlawful distribution to the child.
Amendment History
2002, c. 863.