§ 8.01-223.1.Use of constitutional rights.
Chapter 3. Actions · Article 21. Miscellaneous Provisions · Last amended 2020 · Last verified July 16, 2026
Full Text of § 8.01-223.1
Plain-English Summary
The general rule in this section protects a party’s exercise of a constitutional protection — commonly the Fifth Amendment privilege against self-incrimination — from having that choice held against them in a civil case. A party who declines to testify or produce evidence on constitutional grounds generally cannot have that silence used as evidence of guilt or liability.
The exception is specific and narrow. In civil proceedings for spousal support, custody, or visitation under Title 16.1, or in divorce or separate-maintenance actions under Title 20, filed on or after July 1, 2020, a different rule applies to a particular category of testimony: if a party or witness refuses to answer a question about conduct described in the adultery-related provision of § 20-91(A)(1) or the criminal statute § 18.2-365, on the ground the answer might incriminate them, the trier of fact may draw an adverse inference from that refusal.
That exception effectively singles out sensitive family-law testimony — questions touching on conduct like adultery — as an area where invoking the constitutional privilege carries an evidentiary cost that the general rule otherwise forecloses.
Frequently Asked Questions
Can a party’s decision to plead the Fifth be held against them in a Virginia civil case?
Generally no. Section 8.01-223.1 bars using a party’s exercise of any constitutional protection against them in a civil action, with a narrow family-law exception.
What is the exception for divorce and custody cases?
For qualifying spousal support, custody, visitation, divorce, or separate maintenance proceedings filed on or after July 1, 2020, a party or witness who refuses to answer a question about conduct described in § 20-91(A)(1) or § 18.2-365 on self-incrimination grounds may have the trier of fact draw an adverse inference from that refusal.
What kind of conduct does the exception cover?
The questions have to relate to conduct described in Code sections dealing with adultery-related grounds for divorce, § 20-91(A)(1), or the criminal statute addressing incest and related conduct, § 18.2-365.
Does the exception apply to every civil case, or only certain family-law cases?
Only certain family-law proceedings — spousal support, custody, or visitation cases under Title 16.1, and divorce or separate-maintenance actions under Title 20 — filed on or after July 1, 2020.
Is an adverse inference automatic once someone invokes the privilege in one of these cases?
No. The statute says the trier of fact “may” draw an adverse inference, which makes it discretionary rather than a mandatory conclusion whenever the privilege is invoked.
Amendment History
1985, c. 192; 2020, c. 1062.