RulesofCivilProcedure.com Civil Procedure · Every State

§ 8.01-696.Summary judgment; pro se prisoner civil action.

Chapter 27. Virginia Prisoner Litigation Reform Act · Last amended 2006 · Last verified July 16, 2026

In one sentenceIn a pro se prisoner civil action, either party may move for summary judgment at any time after the case begins, resting on the pleadings, admissions, and affidavits rather than depositions, with the opposing side given ten days to serve its own affidavits before the court decides whether any genuine factual dispute remains.

Full Text of § 8.01-696

Text size

Notwithstanding the provisions of § 8.01-420, any time after commencement of a pro se prisoner civil action, a party may move for summary judgment on all issues based upon the pleadings, any admissions, and supporting affidavits. The adverse party may serve supporting affidavits within 10 days after service of the motion. The judgment sought shall be rendered forthwith if the pleadings, admissions, and affidavits show that there is no genuine issue of material fact and that the moving party is entitled to a judgment as a matter of law.

Plain-English Summary

Section 8.01-420 generally keeps a party from basing a summary judgment motion on discovery depositions unless everyone agrees to it. This section carves prisoner cases out of that limit: a party in a pro se prisoner civil action may move for summary judgment on all issues based on the pleadings, any admissions, and supporting affidavits, and may do so any time after the case commences — there is no need to wait for a particular stage of the litigation.

The mechanics track ordinary summary judgment practice in most other respects. The adverse party has ten days after service of the motion to serve supporting affidavits of its own. The court must render judgment forthwith if the pleadings, admissions, and affidavits show no genuine issue of material fact and that the moving party is entitled to judgment as a matter of law — the same substantive standard used elsewhere, just applied on a faster clock and a narrower evidentiary base.

Because discovery is held back until a case clears the initial dispositive motions, summary judgment in these cases often turns heavily on what is already in the pleadings and on any admissions on file, rather than on a developed discovery record. That gives real weight to how a prisoner’s complaint is drafted from the start.

Frequently Asked Questions

What can a party rely on to support a summary judgment motion in a pro se prisoner case?

The pleadings, any admissions, and supporting affidavits.

How does this differ from the general summary judgment rule in § 8.01-420?

Section 8.01-420 generally restricts basing summary judgment on discovery depositions absent agreement of the parties; this section applies “notwithstanding” that provision, letting summary judgment motions in pro se prisoner cases rest on pleadings, admissions, and affidavits instead.

When can a party move for summary judgment in a pro se prisoner action?

Any time after the action commences.

How long does the opposing party have to respond with affidavits?

Ten days after service of the summary judgment motion.

What standard must be met for the court to grant summary judgment?

The pleadings, admissions, and affidavits must show no genuine issue of material fact and that the moving party is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

Amendment History

2006, c. 435.

Source & verification. Section text and amendment history are reproduced verbatim from the Code of Virginia, published by the Code of Virginia, Virginia Division of Legislative Automated Systems. Last verified July 16, 2026. · Official source
Also known as: virginia prisoner summary judgment rulepro se inmate summary judgment virginia codevirginia code 8.01-696ten days affidavit summary judgment prisonersummary judgment pleadings admissions affidavits virginia inmategenuine issue material fact prisoner case virginia