§ 8.01-6.1.Amendment of pleading changing or adding a claim or defense; relation back.
Chapter 2. Parties · Article 1. General Provisions · Last amended 1996 · Last verified July 16, 2026
Full Text of § 8.01-6.1
Plain-English Summary
Section 8.01-6.1 fills a gap next to § 8.01-6: it addresses amendments that change or add a claim or defense, rather than amendments that change which party is named. Subject to other applicable law, such an amendment relates back to the date of the original pleading for limitations purposes if the court makes three findings — the claim or defense in the amended pleading arose out of the conduct, transaction, or occurrence set out in the original pleading; the amending party was reasonably diligent in asserting the amended claim or defense; and the parties opposing the amendment will not be substantially prejudiced in litigating the merits because of the timing of the amendment.
The section gives the trial court a tool to soften the effect of allowing a late amendment: it may grant a continuance or other relief to protect the parties in connection with the amendment. That flexibility lets the court permit the amendment while still managing any disruption it causes to trial preparation or scheduling.
The section carves out two categories entirely. It does not apply to claims or defenses in eminent domain proceedings or in mechanic’s lien cases, so relation back for amendments in those areas depends on other law rather than this section.
Frequently Asked Questions
Can I add a new claim to my Virginia lawsuit after the statute of limitations has run?
Possibly. Section 8.01-6.1 lets the amendment relate back to the original pleading date if the court finds the claim arose from the same conduct, transaction, or occurrence, the amending party was reasonably diligent, and the opposing parties will not be substantially prejudiced.
What does “reasonably diligent” mean for relation back of a new claim or defense?
Section 8.01-6.1 requires the court to find that the amending party was reasonably diligent in asserting the amended claim or defense — one of the three findings needed before the amendment can relate back.
Can the court do anything to protect the other side if it allows a late amendment to relate back?
Yes. Section 8.01-6.1 lets the trial court grant a continuance or other relief in connection with the amendment to protect the parties.
Does this relation-back rule apply to eminent domain cases?
No. Section 8.01-6.1 states that it does not apply to eminent domain claims or defenses.
Does it apply to mechanic’s lien claims or defenses?
No. Section 8.01-6.1 excludes mechanic’s lien claims and defenses from its relation-back rule as well.
Amendment History
1996, c. 693.