§ 8.01-42.6.Liability of employer for personal injury or death by wrongful act.
Chapter 3. Actions · Article 3. Injury to Person or Property · Last amended 2025 · Last verified July 16, 2026
Full Text of § 8.01-42.6
Plain-English Summary
Subsection A supplies an additional path to employer vicarious liability alongside traditional course-and-scope-of-employment doctrine, tailored to situations where an employee harms someone especially vulnerable to that employee. In an action for personal injury or death by wrongful act brought by a vulnerable victim, or the personal representative of a deceased vulnerable victim, against an employee, the finder of fact determines whether the employer is vicariously liable based on four findings: that the employee’s tortious conduct occurred while reasonably likely to bring the employee into contact with the vulnerable victim and proximately caused the injury or death; that the employer failed to exercise reasonable care to prevent the employee from intentionally harming the victim or to control the employee, resulting in an unreasonable risk of harm; that the employer knew or should have known of its ability to control the employee; and that the employer knew or should have known of the necessity and opportunity for exercising that control.
Subsection B defines “vulnerable victim” as anyone at a substantial disadvantage relative to an employee because of circumstances such as physical or mental condition, and as a matter of law includes a patient of a health care provider, a person under a disability under § 8.01-2, a resident of an assisted living facility, several categories of common-carrier passengers (with exclusions for certain transit services), a passenger of a nonemergency medical transportation carrier, and a business invitee of an esthetics spa or a massage-therapy business.
Subsection C makes the four findings questions of fact, places the burden of proof on the plaintiff, and leaves the employer free to raise any available affirmative defenses.
Frequently Asked Questions
Who qualifies as a “vulnerable victim” under this section?
As a matter of law, the category includes a patient of a health care provider, a person under a legal disability, a resident of an assisted living facility, several categories of common-carrier and nonemergency medical transportation passengers, and a business invitee of an esthetics spa or massage-therapy business, along with anyone else at a substantial disadvantage relative to an employee because of physical or mental condition or similar circumstances.
What does a plaintiff have to prove to hold an employer vicariously liable under this section?
Four things: that the employee’s tortious conduct arose from reasonably likely contact with the vulnerable victim and proximately caused injury or death; that the employer failed to reasonably prevent or control the employee; that the employer knew or should have known of its ability to control the employee; and that the employer knew or should have known of the necessity and opportunity to do so.
Does this section replace the ordinary course-and-scope-of-employment test for employer liability?
No. Subsection A states it operates in addition to any other available grounds for determining the course and scope of employment.
Are all bus and rideshare passengers covered as “vulnerable victims”?
The definition reaches several categories of common-carrier passengers, but it excludes certain transit services, including Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority transit services and, separately, public transit agencies funded by the Commonwealth Mass Transit Fund.
Who has the burden of proving these elements, and can the employer still defend itself?
The plaintiff bears the burden of proof on the four factual findings, and the employer remains free to raise any available affirmative defenses.
Amendment History
2025, cc. 726, 727.