RulesofCivilProcedure.com Civil Procedure · Every State

§ 8.01-281.Pleading in alternative; separate trial on motion of party.

Chapter 7. Civil Actions; Commencement, Pleadings, and Motions · Article 2. Pleadings Generally · Last amended 1983 · Last verified July 16, 2026

In one sentenceSection 8.01-281 lets a party plead alternative facts and theories against alternative parties for claims arising from the same transaction or occurrence, including future-liability contribution, indemnity, subrogation, or contract claims, and lets the court order separate trials, with mandatory severance of certain third-party motor-vehicle negligence claims.

Full Text of § 8.01-281

Text sizeJump to: (A) (B)

A. A party asserting either a claim, counterclaim, cross-claim, or third-party claim or a defense may plead alternative facts and theories of recovery against alternative parties, provided that such claims, defenses, or demands for relief so joined arise out of the same transaction or occurrence. Such claim, counterclaim, cross-claim, or third-party claim may be for contribution, indemnity, subrogation, or contract, express or implied; it may be based on future potential liability, and it shall be no defense thereto that the party asserting such claim, counterclaim, cross-claim, or third- party claim has made no payment or otherwise discharged any claim as to him arising out of the transaction or occurrence.
B. The court may, upon motion of any party, order a separate trial of any claim, counterclaim, cross-claim, or third- party claim, and of any separate issue or of any number of such claims; however, in any action wherein a defendant files a third-party motion for judgment alleging that damages to the person or property of the plaintiff were caused by the negligence of the third-party defendant in the operation of a motor vehicle, the court shall, upon motion of the plaintiff made at least five days in advance of trial, order a separate trial of such third-party claim.

Plain-English Summary

Section 8.01-281(A) gives a party real flexibility in how a claim, counterclaim, cross-claim, third-party claim, or defense gets framed. A party may plead alternative facts and alternative theories of recovery, even against alternative parties, as long as everything pleaded together arises out of the same transaction or occurrence. The claims covered include contribution, indemnity, subrogation, and contract claims, whether express or implied, and they can rest on future potential liability, it is no defense that the party asserting the claim has not yet paid or otherwise discharged any liability of his own arising from that same transaction or occurrence.

Subsection B gives the court discretion to order a separate trial of any claim, counterclaim, cross-claim, third-party claim, or separate issue, on motion of any party. That discretion has one mandatory exception built in: where a defendant files a third-party motion for judgment alleging that the plaintiff’s injuries or property damage were caused by a third-party defendant’s negligent operation of a motor vehicle, the court must order a separate trial of that third-party claim if the plaintiff moves for it at least five days before trial.

Frequently Asked Questions

Can a party plead inconsistent theories of recovery against different parties in the same Virginia lawsuit?

Yes, provided the claims, defenses, or demands for relief joined together arise out of the same transaction or occurrence.

Can a party bring a claim for indemnity or contribution before paying anything?

Yes. The claim may be based on future potential liability, and it is no defense that the party asserting it has made no payment or otherwise discharged the claim.

Can the court order a separate trial for a counterclaim or third-party claim?

Yes, upon motion of any party, the court may order a separate trial of any claim, counterclaim, cross-claim, third-party claim, or separate issue.

Is there a situation where the court must order a separate trial rather than merely having discretion to do so?

Yes. Where a defendant’s third-party motion for judgment alleges the third-party defendant’s negligent operation of a motor vehicle caused the plaintiff’s harm, the court must order a separate trial if the plaintiff moves for it at least five days before trial.

What kinds of claims does subsection A specifically say can be pleaded in the alternative?

Claims for contribution, indemnity, subrogation, or contract, express or implied.

Amendment History

Code 1950, § 8-96.1; 1974, c. 355; 1977, c. 617; 1981, c. 426; 1983, c. 183.

Source & verification. Section text and amendment history are reproduced verbatim from the Code of Virginia, published by the Code of Virginia, Virginia Division of Legislative Automated Systems. Last verified July 16, 2026. · Official source
Also known as: virginia pleading in the alternative8.01-281 explainedvirginia third party claim separate trial motor vehiclealternative theories of recovery virginia lawsuitvirginia indemnity contribution future liability claim