§ 8.01-281.Pleading in alternative; separate trial on motion of party.
Chapter 7. Civil Actions; Commencement, Pleadings, and Motions · Article 2. Pleadings Generally · Last amended 1983 · Last verified July 16, 2026
Full Text of § 8.01-281
Plain-English Summary
Section 8.01-281(A) gives a party real flexibility in how a claim, counterclaim, cross-claim, third-party claim, or defense gets framed. A party may plead alternative facts and alternative theories of recovery, even against alternative parties, as long as everything pleaded together arises out of the same transaction or occurrence. The claims covered include contribution, indemnity, subrogation, and contract claims, whether express or implied, and they can rest on future potential liability, it is no defense that the party asserting the claim has not yet paid or otherwise discharged any liability of his own arising from that same transaction or occurrence.
Subsection B gives the court discretion to order a separate trial of any claim, counterclaim, cross-claim, third-party claim, or separate issue, on motion of any party. That discretion has one mandatory exception built in: where a defendant files a third-party motion for judgment alleging that the plaintiff’s injuries or property damage were caused by a third-party defendant’s negligent operation of a motor vehicle, the court must order a separate trial of that third-party claim if the plaintiff moves for it at least five days before trial.
Frequently Asked Questions
Can a party plead inconsistent theories of recovery against different parties in the same Virginia lawsuit?
Yes, provided the claims, defenses, or demands for relief joined together arise out of the same transaction or occurrence.
Can a party bring a claim for indemnity or contribution before paying anything?
Yes. The claim may be based on future potential liability, and it is no defense that the party asserting it has made no payment or otherwise discharged the claim.
Can the court order a separate trial for a counterclaim or third-party claim?
Yes, upon motion of any party, the court may order a separate trial of any claim, counterclaim, cross-claim, third-party claim, or separate issue.
Is there a situation where the court must order a separate trial rather than merely having discretion to do so?
Yes. Where a defendant’s third-party motion for judgment alleges the third-party defendant’s negligent operation of a motor vehicle caused the plaintiff’s harm, the court must order a separate trial if the plaintiff moves for it at least five days before trial.
What kinds of claims does subsection A specifically say can be pleaded in the alternative?
Claims for contribution, indemnity, subrogation, or contract, express or implied.
Amendment History
Code 1950, § 8-96.1; 1974, c. 355; 1977, c. 617; 1981, c. 426; 1983, c. 183.