Rule 73.Attorney fees
Part IX: Attorneys · Last amended May 1, 2026 · Last verified July 13, 2026
This rule prints two full, separately-dated versions in the official compilation (a pending-amendment straddle); both are shown below.
Full Text of Rule 73
Amendment History
Effective until May 1, 2026
Added effective November 1, 2003; amended effective April 1, 2005; November 1, 2016; November 1, 2018; May 1, 2019; December 9, 2025; May 1, 2026.
Effective May 1, 2026
Added effective November 1, 2003; amended effective April 1, 2005; November 1, 2016; November 1, 2018; May 1, 2019; December 9, 2025; May 1, 2026.
Advisory Committee Notes
Effective until May 1, 2026
Advisory Committee Notes
2018 Amendments. An overwhelming number of cases filed in the courts, especially debt collection cases, result in the entry of an uncontested judgment. The work required in most cases to obtain an uncontested judgment does not typically depend on the amount at issue. As such, the prior schedule of fees based on the amount of damages has been eliminated, and instead replaced by a single fee upon entry of an uncontested judgment that is intended to approximate the work required in the typical case. A second amount is provided where the case is contested and fees are allowed, again in an effort to estimate the typical cost of litigating such cases. Where additional work is required to collect on the judgment, the revised rule provides a default amount for writs and certain motions and eliminates the “considerable additional efforts” limitation of the prior rule. It also recognizes that defendants often change jobs, and thus provides for such default amounts to vary depending on whether a new garnishee is required to collect on the outstanding amount of the judgment. Thus, the amended rule attempts to match the scheduled amounts to the work required of attorneys, rather than tying the scheduled amounts solely to the damages claimed.
But the rule remains flexible so that when attorney fees exceed the scheduled amounts, a party remains free to file an affidavit requesting appropriate fees in accordance with the rule.
The schedule does not limit the amount of a reasonable attorney fee if an affidavit is submitted. The schedule of attorney fees includes amounts for routine orders supplemental to the judgment and routine collection writs. For attorney fees for collection efforts beyond such routine steps, the lawyer should apply to the court under subsections (a) and (b).
2019 Committee Note. Rule 73 has been amended in response to McQuarrie v. McQuarrie, 2017 UT App 209, and Chaparro v. Torero, 2018 UT App 181, to clarify that the rule applies to all motions for attorney fees, not just post- judgment motions.
Effective May 1, 2026
Advisory Committee Notes
2018 Amendments. An overwhelming number of cases filed in the courts, especially debt collection cases, result in the entry of an uncontested judgment. The work required in most cases to obtain an uncontested judgment does not typically depend on the amount at issue. As such, the prior schedule of fees based on the amount of damages has been eliminated, and instead replaced by a single fee upon entry of an uncontested judgment that is intended to approximate the work required in the typical case. A second amount is provided where the case is contested and fees are allowed, again in an effort to estimate the typical cost of litigating such cases. Where additional work is required to collect on the judgment, the revised rule provides a default amount for writs and certain motions and eliminates the “considerable additional efforts” limitation of the prior rule. It also recognizes that defendants often change jobs, and thus provides for such default amounts to vary depending on whether a new garnishee is required to collect on the outstanding amount of the judgment. Thus, the amended rule attempts to match the scheduled amounts to the work required of attorneys, rather than tying the scheduled amounts solely to the damages claimed. But the rule remains flexible so that when attorney fees exceed the scheduled amounts, a party remains free to file an affidavit requesting appropriate fees in accordance with the rule.
The schedule does not limit the amount of a reasonable attorney fee if an affidavit is submitted. The schedule of attorney fees includes amounts for routine orders supplemental to the judgment and routine collection writs. For attorney fees for collection efforts beyond such routine steps, the lawyer should apply to the court under subsections (a) and (b).
2019 Committee Note. Rule 73 has been amended in response to McQuarrie v. McQuarrie, 2017 UT App 209, and Chaparro v. Torero, 2018 UT App 181, to clarify that the rule applies to all motions for attorney fees, not just post- judgment motions.
Plain-English Summary
When the rules, a contract, or a statute lets you recover your attorney fees, Rule 73 tells you how to ask for them and how much you can expect to receive without extra paperwork. The clock starts the moment the court enters judgment: a party has 14 days to file a motion for fees, unless a narrower exception in the rule applies or a specific probate fee statute governs instead. The motion must identify the legal basis for the fees, disclose the fee agreement if the court asks, explain why the amount is reasonable, and state the total claimed along with anything already awarded. A supporting affidavit or declaration backs this up with a breakdown of who did the work, their role, their hourly rate, and the time spent.
For routine cases, the rule skips the affidavit requirement. When a party wins a judgment the other side never contested, the court will award attorney fees up to a set cap without any supporting proof; a higher cap applies when the judgment followed a contested hearing. The same shortcut covers routine post-judgment collection work, such as applying for a garnishment writ or filing a supplemental motion to enforce the judgment, each with its own capped amount that rises if the creditor has to pursue a new garnishee. The schedule increased for judgments and writs entered on or after May 1, 2026, from $350 to $475 for an uncontested judgment and from $750 to $1,020 for a contested one; writ and motion fees rose from $75 to $105 for the first request against a garnishee and from $25 to $35 for follow-up requests. Any fee claim above these caps needs the full motion-and-affidavit process, and the other side keeps the right to object to a fee award whether or not it falls within the schedule.
The rule also lets a court split the question of who owes fees from the question of how much is owed: once liability is settled, a party can submit an affidavit and proposed order, and the court will enter it unless someone objects within 7 days. A party who plans to seek fees under the schedule must flag that intent in the complaint itself, stating the legal basis and, where the claim rests on a contract, attaching a copy of it.
Frequently Asked Questions
How long do I have to ask for attorney fees after judgment?
File the motion within 14 days after the court enters judgment, unless the fee schedule in paragraph (f), a probate fee statute, or another exception in the rule applies.
Do I need to file an affidavit every time I ask for attorney fees?
No. Fee requests that fall within the schedule for uncontested judgments, contested judgments, or routine post-judgment collection writs and motions don't need a supporting affidavit. Anything above those capped amounts, or a general fee claim outside the schedule, still needs a motion and a detailed affidavit describing the work performed.
How much can I recover without an affidavit?
For judgments entered on or after May 1, 2026, up to $475 for an uncontested judgment and up to $1,020 for a contested one. Writ applications and routine collection motions allow up to $105 for the first request against a garnishee and up to $35 for a follow-up request. Judgments entered before May 1, 2026 used a lower schedule: $350, $750, $75, and $25.
Can the other side object to a scheduled fee amount?
Yes. Using the fee schedule doesn't eliminate anyone's right to object to a claimed fee, whether the amount falls within the schedule or was requested through a full motion and affidavit.
Can the court decide who owes fees before deciding how much?
Yes. The court may resolve liability for fees first. Once that's settled, the party owed fees can submit an affidavit and a proposed order, and the court enters it unless another party objects within 7 days.