Rule 64C.Writ of attachment
Part VIII: Provisional and Final Remedies and Special Proceedings · Last amended April 1, 2006 · Last verified July 13, 2026
Full Text of Rule 64C
Amendment History
Repealed and reenacted effected November 1, 2004; amended effective April 1, 2006.
Plain-English Summary
A writ of attachment reaches property the defendant possesses or controls directly — unlike garnishment, which reaches property a third party holds for the defendant. As a prejudgment writ, it has to satisfy Rule 64A's requirements first: the motion, security, affidavit, and the combination of mandatory and alternative grounds laid out there.
Attachment adds its own grounds on top of Rule 64A's. The defendant has to be indebted to the plaintiff, and the claim has to fit one of three categories: the action is on a contract, the defendant is a nonresident of Utah or a foreign corporation not qualified to do business here, or a statute independently authorizes the writ. Finally, the claim can't already be secured by a lien on property in Utah.
Frequently Asked Questions
When can I use a writ of attachment instead of garnishment?
Attachment reaches property the defendant directly possesses or controls. Garnishment reaches property a third party — a bank, an employer, anyone else — is holding for the defendant.
Does a writ of attachment require a contract claim?
Not necessarily. A contract claim is one of three alternative paths — attachment is also available against a nonresident defendant or an unqualified foreign corporation, or whenever a separate statute authorizes it.
Can I attach property that's already secured by a lien?
No. One of the required grounds is that payment of the claim hasn't already been secured by a lien on property in Utah.