Rule 21.Misjoinder and non-joinder of parties
Part IV: Parties · Not amended since adoption on record · Last verified July 13, 2026
Full Text of Rule 21
Plain-English Summary
Mistakes about who belongs in a lawsuit happen, and Rule 21 keeps them from being fatal. Misjoinder of parties — naming someone who should not be in the case — is not grounds for dismissal. Instead, the court can drop or add parties on its own initiative or on any party's motion, at any point in the case, on whatever terms are fair. If one claim against a party does not belong with the rest of the case, the court can sever it and let it proceed as its own separate action rather than dismissing anything outright.
Frequently Asked Questions
Can a case be dismissed because the wrong person was named as a party?
No. Rule 21 makes clear that misjoinder of parties is never grounds for dismissal. The court fixes the problem by adding or dropping parties instead.
Can the court add or remove a party without either side asking?
Yes. Rule 21 lets the court act on its own initiative, as well as on a party's motion, to add or drop parties at any stage of the case.
What does it mean to "sever" a claim under this rule?
It means the court splits a claim against a particular party out of the main case and lets it proceed as its own separate lawsuit, rather than keeping everything bundled together or dismissing anything.