Rule 15.Amended and supplemental pleadings
Part III: Pleadings, Motions, and Orders · Last amended November 1, 2016 · Last verified July 13, 2026
Full Text of Rule 15
Amendment History
Amended effective May 1, 2014; November 1, 2016.
Advisory Committee Notes
Advisory Committee Notes
Although the precise language is different for purposes of clarity, the 2016 amendments to Utah Rule of Civil Procedure 15(c) adopt the approach of Federal Rule 15(c) regarding the relation-back of an amended pleading when the amended pleading adds a new party.
Plain-English Summary
Rule 15 governs changes to a pleading after it's filed. A party can amend once as a matter of course — without asking anyone — within 21 days of serving the original pleading, or, if a response is required, within 21 days after that response is served or 21 days after a Rule 12(b), (e), or (f) motion is served, whichever comes first. After that window, a party needs either the court's permission or the opposing party's written consent, and the court is directed to give that permission freely when justice calls for it. A party seeking permission must attach the proposed amended pleading to the motion. Once a pleading is amended, any required response is due within whatever time remained to respond to the original pleading, or 14 days after the amendment is served, whichever is later.
Rule 15 also addresses amendments that surface during or after trial. If the parties try an issue that wasn't in the pleadings, without objection, the court treats it as if it had been pleaded all along, and a party can move to amend at any time, even after judgment, to match the pleadings to the evidence. If a party does object that evidence falls outside the pleadings, the court can still allow an amendment, and should do so freely when it will help resolve the case on the merits and the objecting side can't show it would be prejudiced; the court can grant a continuance to let that side respond to the new evidence.
The relation-back doctrine in Rule 15(c) lets an amendment count as if it were filed on the date of the original pleading — a critical protection when a statute of limitations has run in the meantime. Relation back applies when the applicable statute of limitations itself allows it, when the amendment arises from the same conduct, transaction, or occurrence already described in the original pleading, or when the amendment corrects the identity of a party, provided the new party learned of the action in time to avoid prejudice and knew or should have known it would have been named but for a mistake about identity. Finally, Rule 15(d) lets a party file a supplemental pleading, with the court's permission, to add events that happened after the original pleading was filed — even if that original pleading had its own defects.
Frequently Asked Questions
Can I amend my complaint without asking the court?
Yes, within limits. Rule 15(a)(1) lets you amend once as a matter of course within 21 days of serving the original pleading, or, if a responsive pleading is required, within 21 days after that response is served or 21 days after a Rule 12(b), (e), or (f) motion is served, whichever is earlier. Outside that window, you need the court's permission or the other side's written consent.
What does it mean for an amendment to 'relate back'?
It means the law treats the amended pleading as though it were filed on the date of the original pleading, rather than the later date it was filed. That matters most when a statute of limitations has expired between the two filings. Relation back applies when the amendment arises from the same conduct, transaction, or occurrence already in the original pleading, among other conditions in Rule 15(c).
Can I fix a defendant's name after the statute of limitations has run?
Sometimes. Rule 15(c)(3) allows an amendment that corrects a party's identity to relate back to the original filing date if the underlying claim already satisfies Rule 15(c)(2), and if, within the time Rule 4(b) allows for serving the summons and complaint, the new party got enough notice of the action to avoid being prejudiced in defending it, and knew or should have known it would have been sued but for a mistake about its identity.
Can I amend my pleadings in the middle of trial?
Yes. If an issue outside the pleadings gets tried by the parties' consent, express or implied, Rule 15(b)(1) treats it as if it had been pleaded, and either side can move to amend — even after judgment — to match the pleadings to what was tried. If a party objects that evidence falls outside the pleadings, the court can still allow an amendment under Rule 15(b)(2), and should do so freely when it would help resolve the case .
What's the difference between an amended pleading and a supplemental pleading?
An amended pleading revises what's already alleged, usually about events that happened before the original pleading was filed. A supplemental pleading, allowed under Rule 15(d) on motion and notice, adds new transactions, occurrences, or events that happened after the pleading being supplemented was filed. The court can permit a supplemental pleading even if the original pleading had its own problems.