Rule 66.Receivers
Part VIII: Provisional and Final Remedies and Special Proceedings · Last amended 1966 · Last verified July 16, 2026
Full Text of Rule 15-6-66
Plain-English Summary
Rule 15-6-66 protects whatever a receiver is managing on the court’s behalf by limiting how the underlying case can end. Once a receiver has been appointed in an action, that action cannot be dismissed outright — dismissal takes a court order, not just the parties’ agreement or a plaintiff’s decision to walk away.
The rule then splits governing law in two directions. How the receiver administers the estate — the day-to-day practice of managing property, accounting for it, and winding it up — follows the applicable statute and the practice South Dakota courts have already established for receivers and similar court-appointed officers. Everything else about the litigation itself, whether the action seeks appointment of a receiver or is brought by or against one, runs under the ordinary rules of civil procedure like any other case.
Frequently Asked Questions
Can a South Dakota lawsuit be voluntarily dismissed after a receiver has been appointed?
No. Rule 15-6-66 states that an action in which a receiver has been appointed shall not be dismissed except by order of the court.
What rules govern how a receiver administers an estate in South Dakota?
Rule 15-6-66 directs that administration of estates by receivers, or by other similar court-appointed officers, follow applicable statute and the practice previously followed in South Dakota courts.
Do the ordinary rules of civil procedure apply to a lawsuit brought by or against a receiver?
Yes. Rule 15-6-66 states that in all other respects, an action in which appointment of a receiver is sought, or that is brought by or against a receiver, is governed by this chapter.
Who can end a South Dakota case once a receiver has been appointed?
Only the court, by order, under Rule 15-6-66.
Does Rule 15-6-66 set the standard for when a receiver should be appointed?
No. It addresses what happens to the action after a receiver is appointed and what governs receivership litigation generally, rather than the standard for appointing a receiver in the first place.