Part VII: Judgment · Last amended 1978 · Last verified July 16, 2026
In one sentenceRule 15-6-62 automatically stays enforcement of a judgment for thirty days after entry, lets the court stay enforcement with security while a new trial, relief from judgment, or renewed judgment as a matter of law motion is pending, and coordinates with chapter 15-26A for stays and injunctions during an appeal.
(a)Automatic stay of execution. Except as stated herein or as otherwise ordered by the court for good cause shown, or upon default judgment, no execution shall issue upon a judgment nor shall proceedings be taken for its enforcement until the expiration of thirty days after its entry. Unless otherwise ordered by the court, temporary or permanent judgment in an action for an injunction or in a receivership action shall not be stayed during the period after its entry and until an appeal is taken or during the pendency of an appeal. The provisions of § 15-6-62(c) govern the suspending, modifying, restoring, or granting of an injunction during the pendency of an appeal.
(b)Stay of execution on motion for new trial or for relief from judgment. In its discretion and on such conditions for the security of the adverse party as are proper, the court may stay the execution of or any proceedings to enforce a judgment pending the disposition of a motion for a new trial made pursuant to § 15-6-59, or of a motion for relief from a judgment or order made pursuant to § 15-6-60, or of a motion for judgment in accordance with a motion for a directed verdict made pursuant to § 15-6-50.
(c)Injunction pending appeal. Injunction pending appeal shall be as provided in chapter 15-26A.
(d)Stay upon appeal. Stay upon appeal shall be as provided in chapter 15-26A.
(e)Stay in favor of state or agency. Any stay in favor of the state or agency thereof shall be as provided in chapter 15-26A.
(f)Supreme Court’s power not limited. The provisions in § 15-6-62 do not limit any power of the Supreme Court to stay proceedings during the pendency of an appeal or to suspend, modify, restore, or grant an injunction during the pendency of an appeal or to make any order appropriate to preserve the status quo or the effectiveness of the judgment subsequently to be entered.
(g)Multiple claims or parties. When a court has ordered a final judgment under the conditions stated in § 15-6-54(b), the court may stay enforcement of that judgment until the entering of a subsequent judgment or judgments and may prescribe such conditions as are necessary to secure the benefit thereof to the party in whose favor the judgment is entered.
Plain-English Summary
Rule 15-6-62 gives the losing party breathing room before a judgment can be enforced. Except where the rule itself says otherwise, or the court orders otherwise for good cause, or the judgment was entered by default, no execution can issue and no enforcement proceedings can begin until thirty days after entry of judgment. That automatic stay does not extend to injunctions or receivership judgments, which are not stayed pending appeal unless the court orders it — those are governed instead by the rule’s separate provision on injunctions pending appeal.
Beyond that automatic window, the court has discretion to stay enforcement further, on whatever security conditions it sets, while certain post-trial motions are pending: a motion for a new trial under Rule 15-6-59, a motion for relief from judgment under Rule 15-6-60, or a renewed motion for judgment as a matter of law under Rule 15-6-50. That discretion lets the court hold enforcement in place while the motions that could change or undo the judgment are still being decided.
For injunctions and stays pending on appeal, Rule 15-6-62 hands off to chapter 15-26A, which governs injunctions pending appeal, stays upon appeal generally, and stays in favor of the state or a state agency. None of that limits the Supreme Court’s own power to stay proceedings, to suspend, modify, restore, or grant an injunction while an appeal is pending, or to enter whatever order is needed to preserve the status quo or protect the judgment eventually to be entered.
The rule also reaches back to the multiple-claims situation Rule 15-6-54(b) addresses. When a court has certified a partial judgment as final under that rule, Rule 15-6-62(g) lets it also stay enforcement of that judgment until the remaining claims are resolved, and set whatever conditions are needed to secure the benefit of the judgment for the party who won it.
Frequently Asked Questions
How long after judgment is entered can a South Dakota judgment be enforced?
Rule 15-6-62(a) provides an automatic stay of execution and enforcement for thirty days after entry of judgment, except as otherwise ordered for good cause or where the judgment was entered by default.
Does a default judgment get the automatic thirty-day stay in South Dakota?
No. Rule 15-6-62(a) specifically excepts default judgments from the automatic thirty-day stay of execution.
Can a South Dakota court stay enforcement of a judgment while a motion for a new trial is pending?
Yes. Rule 15-6-62(b) lets the court, on conditions it sets for the adverse party’s security, stay execution while a motion for a new trial under Rule 15-6-59, a motion for relief from judgment under Rule 15-6-60, or a renewed motion for judgment as a matter of law under Rule 15-6-50 is pending.
Are preliminary injunctions automatically stayed while a South Dakota appeal is pending?
No. Rule 15-6-62(a) states that a temporary or permanent injunction, or a judgment in a receivership action, is not stayed during the period after entry and until appeal or during the appeal itself, unless the court orders otherwise.
If a South Dakota court certifies part of a case as a final judgment, can it delay enforcing that judgment?
Yes. Rule 15-6-62(g) lets the court stay enforcement of a judgment entered under the Rule 15-6-54(b) multiple-claims procedure until a subsequent judgment or judgments are entered, on whatever conditions are necessary to protect the prevailing party’s benefit.
Amendment History
(a)SD RCP, Rule 62 (a), as adopted by Sup. Ct. Order March 29, 1966, effective July 1, 1966; Supreme Court Rule No. 4, 1972, effective January 1, 1973; SL 1978, ch 155, § 3.
(b)SD RCP, Rule 62 (b), as adopted by Sup. Ct. Order March 29, 1966, effective July 1, 1966.
(c)SD RCP, Rule 62 (c), as adopted by Sup. Ct. Order March 29, 1966, effective July 1, 1966.
(d)SD RCP, Rule 62 (d), as adopted by Sup. Ct. Order March 29, 1966, effective July 1, 1966.
(e)SD RCP, Rule 62 (e), as adopted by Sup. Ct. Order March 29, 1966, effective July 1, 1966.
(f)SD RCP, Rule 62 (f), as adopted by Sup. Ct. Order March 29, 1966, effective July 1, 1966.
(g)SD RCP, Rule 62 (g), as adopted by Sup. Ct. Order March 29, 1966, effective July 1, 1966.
Source & verification. Rule text and History are
reproduced verbatim from the South Dakota Codified Laws, published by the
South Dakota Legislative Research Council. Last verified July 16, 2026.
· Official source
Also known as:south dakota stay of judgment enforcementthirty day automatic stay south dakotastay pending appeal south dakota civil casestay of enforcement new trial motion pendinginjunction pending appeal south dakota