Rule 35.Physical and Mental Examinations and Blood Tests of Persons
Part V: Discovery · Last amended 1966 · Last verified July 16, 2026
In one sentenceRule 15-6-35 lets a court order a physical or mental examination or blood test of a party whose condition, or whose relationship to another person, is in dispute, and it explains how the examiner’s report gets shared and what privilege a party gives up by requesting one.
(a)Order to submit to examination. In an action in which the mental or physical condition of a party or the consanguinity of a party with another person or party is in controversy, the court in which the action is pending may order such person or party to submit to a physical or mental examination or blood test by a physician. The order may be made only on motion for good cause shown and upon notice to the person or party to be examined and to all other persons or parties involved and shall specify the time, place, manner, conditions, and scope of the examination and the person or persons by whom it is to be made.
(1)If requested by the party against whom an order is made under § 15-6-35(a) or the person examined, the party causing the examination to be made shall deliver to him a copy of a detailed written report of the examining physician setting out his findings, including results of all tests made, diagnoses and conclusions, together with like reports of all earlier examinations of the same condition. After delivery the party causing the examination shall be entitled upon request to receive from the party against whom the order is made a like report of any examination, previously or thereafter made, of the same condition, unless, in the case of a report of examination of a person not a party, the party shows that he is unable to obtain it. The court on motion may make an order against a party requiring delivery of a report on such terms as are just, and if a physician fails or refuses to make a report the court may exclude his testimony if offered at the trial.
(2)By requesting and obtaining a report of the examination so ordered or by taking the deposition of the examiner, the party examined waives any privilege he may have in that action or any other involving the same controversy, regarding the testimony of every other person who has examined or may thereafter examine him in respect of the same mental or physical condition.
(3)This subdivision applies to examinations made by agreement of the parties, unless the agreement expressly provides otherwise. This subdivision does not preclude discovery of a report of an examining physician or the taking of a deposition of the physician in accordance with the provisions of any other rule.
Plain-English Summary
Rule 15-6-35 lets a court order a party to submit to a physical or mental examination, or a blood test, when that party’s physical or mental condition, or a party’s blood relationship to another person, is in dispute in the case. The court cannot order an exam on its own initiative; it takes a motion, a showing of good cause, and notice to the person who will be examined and to every other party or person involved. The resulting order must spell out the time, place, manner, conditions, and scope of the exam, and name who will conduct it.
Once the exam happens, either side can ask for the examining physician’s findings. If the examined party or the party against whom the order was made requests it, the party who arranged the exam must deliver a detailed written report covering the physician’s findings, test results, diagnoses, and conclusions, along with reports from any earlier exams of the same condition. After that delivery, the requesting party owes the same courtesy in return: on request, it must produce a like report of any exam of that condition, past or future, done at its own arrangement, unless it cannot obtain a nonparty’s report despite trying. The court can order a report produced on fair terms, and if a physician will not write one, the court can bar that physician from testifying at trial.
Asking for and getting the report, or deposing the examining physician, comes at a cost: it waives the examined party’s privilege over the testimony of every other physician who has examined, or later examines, that same condition, in that case or in any other case about the same underlying dispute. These report-sharing and waiver rules apply equally to exams the parties agree to on their own, unless their agreement says otherwise, and none of this stops a party from separately seeking an examining physician’s report or deposition through the ordinary channels of another discovery rule.
Frequently Asked Questions
Can a court force me to undergo a medical exam if I am suing over an injury in South Dakota?
Yes, if your physical or mental condition is in dispute in the case. Rule 15-6-35 requires a motion, a showing of good cause, and notice before the court orders the exam, and the order must set the time, place, manner, conditions, and scope.
If I get a copy of the other side’s medical exam report, do I have to share mine in return?
Yes. Rule 15-6-35 requires the party who requested and obtained a report to produce, on request, a like report of any exam of that same condition, unless it cannot obtain a nonparty’s report despite trying.
What happens to my privilege if I request the report from my own exam?
You waive it. Rule 15-6-35 says requesting and obtaining the report, or deposing the examiner, waives your privilege over the testimony of every other physician who has examined, or later examines, that same condition, in that case or in any related one.
Does this rule apply to exams the parties agree to without a court order?
Yes. Rule 15-6-35 applies to examinations by agreement of the parties as well, unless the agreement itself says otherwise.
What if the doctor who examined me refuses to write a report?
Rule 15-6-35 lets the court exclude that physician’s testimony at trial if the physician fails or refuses to make the report.
Amendment History
(a)SDC 1939 & Supp 1960, § 36.0602; SD RCP, Rule 35 (a), as adopted by Sup. Ct. Order March 29, 1966, effective July 1, 1966.
(b)SDC 1939 & Supp 1960, §§ 36.0603, 36.0604; SD RCP, Rule 35 (b), as adopted by Sup. Ct. Order March 29, 1966, effective July 1, 1966; Supreme Court Rule 76-3, § 9.
Source & verification. Rule text and History are
reproduced verbatim from the South Dakota Codified Laws, published by the
South Dakota Legislative Research Council. Last verified July 16, 2026.
· Official source
Also known as:independent medical examination south dakotacompel mental exam sd rule 35physical exam order civil case south dakotaexamining physician report sdwaiver of privilege medical exam south dakota