Rule 20.Permissive Joinder of Parties
Part IV: Parties · Last amended 1969 · Last verified July 16, 2026
Full Text of Rule 15-6-20
Plain-English Summary
Rule 15-6-20 governs when a South Dakota case can involve more than one plaintiff or more than one defendant by choice, rather than by necessity under Rule 15-6-19. Subdivision (a) allows multiple people to join as plaintiffs if they assert a right to relief jointly, severally, or in the alternative arising out of the same transaction, occurrence, or series of transactions or occurrences, and if a question of law or fact common to all of them will arise in the case. The same standard applies to joining multiple defendants: they can be joined together if a right to relief is asserted against them jointly, severally, or in the alternative arising from that same kind of connected event, with a common question running through the case. No joined plaintiff or defendant needs to have an interest in every form of relief sought, and the court can enter judgment for some plaintiffs and against some defendants according to each one’s rights and liabilities.
Subdivision (b) gives the court a tool to manage the practical costs of that kind of joinder. It may enter orders preventing a party from being embarrassed, delayed, or put to unnecessary expense because they were joined alongside a party against whom they assert no claim and who asserts none against them, including ordering separate trials or other measures to prevent delay or prejudice.
Frequently Asked Questions
Can several people who were hurt by the same event sue together in one South Dakota lawsuit?
Yes, if their claims arise from the same transaction, occurrence, or series of transactions or occurrences and a question of law or fact common to all of them will arise. Rule 15-6-20(a) allows that kind of joinder as plaintiffs.
Can multiple defendants be sued together in one action?
Yes, under the same standard that applies to joining plaintiffs. Rule 15-6-20(a) allows joining defendants when a right to relief is asserted against them jointly, severally, or in the alternative arising from the same transaction, occurrence, or series, with a common question of law or fact.
Do all the joined plaintiffs need to want the same relief?
No. Rule 15-6-20(a) states that a plaintiff or defendant need not be interested in obtaining or defending against all the relief demanded, and judgment may be entered for or against parties according to their own respective rights and liabilities.
What can I do if I’m joined in a case alongside a defendant I have no real dispute with?
Rule 15-6-20(b) lets the court order separate trials or other measures to prevent a party from being embarrassed, delayed, or put to expense by inclusion alongside a party against whom no claim is asserted and who asserts none in return.
What’s the difference between this rule and the rule on necessary parties?
Rule 15-6-20 governs permissive joinder — parties who may choose to join because their claims share a transactional link and a common question — while Rule 15-6-19 governs when a party must be joined for the action to proceed justly.