Rule 4:29-2.Separate trials
Last amended September 1, 1994 · Current through June 18, 2026 · Last verified July 7, 2026
Full Text of Rule 4:29-2
Amendment History
New Jersey publishes each rule’s amendment record in a “History” note beneath the rule. It is reproduced verbatim below; the “R.R.” citations refer to the former Revised Rules numbering the current rules replaced.
Source-R.R. 4:33-2; amended July 13, 1994 to be effective September 1, 1994.
Plain-English Summary
Broad joinder can sweep in a party who has nothing to do with part of the case. This rule is the counterweight: the court may make orders to prevent a party from being embarrassed, delayed, or put to expense because another party was joined where there are no claims between them.
The available tools include ordering separate trials or other measures to prevent delay or prejudice, so joinder serves efficiency without unfairly burdening an unrelated party.
Frequently Asked Questions
Can the court separate improperly joined parties?
Yes. To prevent embarrassment, delay, or expense from the joinder of a party against whom no claims are made, the court may order separate trials or make other orders to prevent delay or prejudice.