Rule 5.Service, Filing, and Form of Pleadings and Other Documents
Last amended November 1, 2023 · Last verified July 8, 2026
Full Text of Rule 5
Advisory Committee’s Notes & Reporter’s Notes
Advisory Note – November 2023
The title of Rule 5 is amended to indicate that it governs the form of pleadings and to refer to documents instead of papers in light of the Maine Rules of Electronic Court Systems.
Subdivision (a) is amended to refer to documents instead of papers in light of the Maine Rules of Electronic Court Systems.
Subdivision (b) is amended, in light of the Maine Rules of Electronic Court Systems, to clarify that “Electronic Service” is defined only for purpose of Rule 5. A change in formatting has also been incorporated.
Subdivisions (d) through (g) are amended in light of the Maine Rules of Electronic Court Systems, and to resolve an inconsistency between subdivisions (a) and (d) with regard to the timing of filing and service.
Subdivision (h) is amended to incorporate clarifying language, to indicate that the Summary Sheet is available on the Judicial Branch website, and to specify that family and probate matters cases require the Family and Probate Matters Summary Sheet.
Subdivision (i) is amended to refer to documents instead of papers in light of the Maine Rules of Electronic Court Systems, to incorporate formatting
requirements formerly located in Rule 7(f), to add a reference to the Maine Rules of Electronic Court Systems, and to update a two-sided document requirement in light of the Maine Rules of Electronic Court Systems.
The language of subdivision (k) is replaced. It describes the methods of filing. New subdivision (k)(1) defines “paper filing.” It allows for filing by electronic means in courts that ordinarily accept only paper filing if an administrative order or other court order authorizes that method of filing. New subdivision (k)(2) provides that “electronic filing” refers to filing using the court’s electronic filing system, and the filing party must comply with the requirements of the Maine Rules of Electronic Court Systems unless the court provides otherwise through an administrative order.
Advisory Note – October 2022
Subdivision (a) is amended to insert subdivision number (1) and incorporate a new subdivision (2), which references the requirements of Rule 55(f).
Advisory Note – July 2018
Rule 5(a) has been amended to specify that service must be made “no later than the date on which the paper is filed with the court.”
The Court has amended Rule 5(b), together with simultaneous amendments to Rules 3, 4, 11, and 101 of the Maine Rules of Civil Procedure, to: • require parties who are represented by attorneys to serve pleadings and other papers electronically upon one another or by delivering copies pursuant to Rule 5(b)(1) following service of the summons and complaint under Rule 4; • permit unrepresented parties to opt in to Electronic Service if they have the technology to participate; and • provide notice to unrepresented parties of the option to participate in Electronic Service within the summons and complaint package by amending language in the summons form and by requiring service, together with the summons and complaint, of the notice regarding Electronic Service.
The requirements and procedures of Electronic Service pertain only to the service of pleadings and documents by each party upon the other parties in a court action. Electronic Service does not alter, affect or in any way relate to a party’s filing requirements with any court or clerk’s office.
The amendment to Rule 5(b) describes the procedures for complying with the requirements of Electronic Service. This amendment requires attorneys who practice in Maine courts to employ technologies necessary to accomplish Electronic Service.
The amendment defines “Electronic Service” for pleadings and documents, and specifically excludes from its requirements voluminous summary judgment records, documents produced pursuant to Rules 33 and 34, and the record of proceedings filed pursuant to Rules 80B and 80C. The Rule also clarifies that Electronic Service is complete when transmitted, that it is presumed to have been received by the intended recipient, and that pleadings and documents transmitted by Electronic Service shall have the same legal effect as service of an original paper document.
The Rule also provides that if an email is undeliverable or otherwise cannot be successfully delivered, service of a paper copy of the pleading or document must then be made by regular mail. Service shall be deemed complete (1) upon the attempted Electronic Service for the purposes of the sender meeting any time period and (2) upon mailing for the purposes of starting any time period.
All documents served electronically shall be scanned copies of the original signed papers.
Advisory Note – July 2012
Rule 5(i) addresses the service and filing of papers in civil proceedings. This amendment mandates the use of condensed transcripts copied on both sides of the page unless otherwise ordered by the court.
Advisory Note – November 2011
This is a technical amendment to Rule 5(h) to replace the reference to former Rule 80(k) addressing post judgment motions in family matters with the reference to Rule 120, the current rule addressing such post judgment motions.
Advisory Notes
In light of current discussions of electronic filing, M.R. Civ. P. 5(k) is added to clarify that, for the present time, electronic filing with the Maine courts is not permitted. Presently, the trial courts lack the capacity to receive, record or retain electronically filed documents.
Advisory Notes
Pursuant to M.R. Civ. P. 5(f), documents filed at clerks’ offices and not signed or otherwise accompanied by the requisite fee or some legally required element are sent back without a copy being retained and without being docketed. As a result, there is no accurate record of what was filed or when it was filed, but only a copy of the notice of returning the document with the date of the return notice. When it turns out a document may have been improperly sent back, or a minor inadvertence could have been corrected, there is now way to recreate what was filed and when it was filed. As a result, important rights may be lost if the documents were time sensitive due to statutes of limitations or filing deadlines. The problem has escalated recently, particularly in domestic relations cases, due to confusion in clerks’ offices as to what filings do or do not require fees under the Court Fees Schedule adopted in August, 2003. For example, motions to amend child support do not require fees, motions to amend other parental rights do require fees.
The amendment addresses this problem by having the clerk retain a copy of the document attempted to be filed so that some reflection of timing of the filing is preserved and some recourse is possible in case of an error in rejecting a document.
Advisory Committee’s Notes — July 1, 2001
[Rule 5(b) Amendment]
The Court has amended the Maine Bar Rules and Rules 5, 11 and 89 of the Maine Rules of Civil Procedure to permit attorneys to assist an otherwise unrepresented litigant on a limited basis without undertaking the full representation of the client on all issues related to the legal matter for which the attorney is engaged. By these amendments, the Court has sought to enlarge access to justice in Maine courts.
The amendment to Rule 5(b) makes clear that where an attorney has filed a limited appearance under amended Rule 11(b), service of papers upon the attorney is not required. Service is sufficient if made upon the party, despite the limited representation. The purpose of the amendment is to avoid confusion by establishing the identity of the person to be served throughout the case. The amendment places the burden upon the otherwise unrepresented litigant and the attorney filing the limited appearance to ensure that have made arrangements for served papers to be processed in a timely fashion. At the same time, two observations are appropriate. First, the amendment applies only in cases in which the limited appearance has been filed under Rule 11(b); in all other cases, the first sentence of Rule 5(b) requires service on the attorney, not the represented party. Second, even in cases in which service upon the party is permitted, the amendment is not intended to discourage the tradition of courtesy among the Maine Bar by sending to the attorney copies of served papers.
[Rule 5(d) Amendment]
M.R. Civ. P. 83(3) provides that a reference to an attorney includes the party represented by the attorney, and a reference to a party includes the party’s attorney. However, change in Rule 5 is recommended to specify that it covers parties, which include attorneys, to avoid potential for confusion by individuals representing themselves who may believe that, because of the Rule 5(d) references to “attorney,” unrepresented parties may have a lesser obligation with regard to service on other parties. The rule change clarifies the point and makes clear that parties representing themselves have the same
obligation as represented parties to serve documents filed with the court on all other parties and be subject to the obligations of Rule 11 in such filings.
Advisory Committee’s Notes — May 1, 2000
Rule 5 (e), (f), and (g) are significantly amended, principally to accommodate the MEJIS changes directed by the November 27, 1996, September 19, 1997, May 1, 1998 and July 31, 1998 Administrative Orders.
Subdivision (h) is entirely new and references pleading summary sheets. It is taken, with modification, from the Administrative Orders and includes provisions which the Administrative Orders indicated should be included in Rules 8 and 10. The provisions indicated for Rules 8 or 10 are moved to this new Rule 5(h) so that pleading summary sheets are addressed only in one rule which addresses filing of papers, which appears to be the most appropriate place for the discussion.
The changes in subdivisions (f) and (g) are likewise intended to incorporate the MEJIS changes with language closely following those changes.
Subdivision (i) conforms to recent rules amendments to Rule 7(f) requiring materials to be filed, typed double spaced or printed on 8 1/2 x 11 paper. Additionally, the rule would require that text appear on only one side of each page.
Subdivision (g) addresses after hours and out of venue filing requirements from the Administrative Order of September 19, 1997.
Subdivision (j) is added to incorporate the substance of the FAX filing Administrative Order of November 22, 1996.
Advisory Committee’s Notes
Rule 5(f) [now (i)(2)] is amended to permit the filing of miniaturized transcripts containing up to four 8 1/2 x 11 inch pages reduced to fit on a single 8 1/2 x 11-inch page. Such “travel transcripts” are commonly used by lawyers for their own purposes. They involve significant savings in cost and bulk.
Allowing miniaturized transcripts to be filed in court will both eliminate the need to obtain a full-sized transcript for that purpose and ease the filing burden for the clerks’ offices. The final clause assures that reporters will not be forced to obtain the equipment necessary to produce the miniaturized transcripts. Simultaneous amendments of Rules 26(f) and 74(b) make clear that such transcripts may be used both for depositions that are to be served or filed and for the transcript on appeal.
Advisory Committee’s Notes
Rule 5(d) is amended simultaneously with the addition of Rule 26(f) to make the requirement of filing all papers with the court subject to the provisions of the latter rule, which will eliminate the requirement of filing for discovery materials.
Advisory Committee’s Note — September 1, 1980
This rule is amended to eliminate the requirement that docket information appear on the back of all pleadings and other papers. This information is necessary only for documents filed in the traditional triple- folded manner. With flat filing, the need for this practice is eliminated.
Advisory Committee’s Note — November 15, 1976
It is the purpose of this amendment to require that pleadings filed with the Court shall be on 8½ x 1.1 inch paper. This provision has previously been accomplished in the Maine Rules of Criminal Procedure and this amendment is intended to secure conformity with respect to the size of pleadings in both criminal cases and civil cases.
The Committee recognizes that there may be isolated instances in which added expense may be incurred in preparing the record for purposes of appellate proceedings in certain types of proceedings, An example is in the case of probate appeals in some of the counties where the Probate Court utilizes pre- printed forms which are of legal size. It is suggested that in such cases an application be made to the Superior Court Justice or the District Court Judge
when such cases are first entered with the Court for permission to utilize legal size pleadings in order to avoid the added expense of re-typing pleadings for inclusion in the record on appeal. It is presumed that in such cases where a proper showing of an avoidance of unnecessary expense can be made, the justice or judge hearing such application would allow it.
Advisory Committee’s Note — October 1, 1970
In connection with the general revision of the Discovery Rules (for an over-all discussion of which see the Advisory Committee’s Note to Rule 26), Rule 5(a) is amended to include among the papers which must be served upon each party “every paper relating to discovery required to be served upon a party.” Although the existing language expressly includes notices and demands, it is not clear whether answers and responses to discovery under Rules 33, 34, and 36 are required to be served upon all parties or only upon the parties seeking the discovery. The court may relieve a party from this obligation of serving on all parties if it is too onerous because the discovery papers are particularly voluminous or the parties particularly numerous.
Advisory Committee’s Note — December 31, 1967
The addition to Rule 5(a) makes clear that the pre-trial memorandum provided for in amended Rule 16 must be served upon each of the parties.
Explanation of Amendment — November 1, 1966
This amendment was taken from a 1963 amendment to F.R. 5(a). The exception it contains is to make it clear that an inconsistent provision elsewhere in the rules is controlling. There is, for example, such an inconsistent provision in Rule 5(c).
Reporter’s Notes — December 1, 1959
This rule describes the mechanics of serving and filing pleadings and other papers. It is substantially the same as Federal Rule 5. The reference to
notice of change of attorneys in subdivision (a) is not in the federal rule, nor is the sentence in subdivision (b) concerning the sufficiency of notice to the former attorney until notice of the change has been served. These are taken from Revised Rules of Court 2.
The last two sentences of subdivision (d) are not in the federal rule. The purpose is to eliminate all formalities as to proof of service of papers upon other parties. If an adverse party raises a question of notice, appropriate proof will naturally have to be made.
Subdivision (f) is not in the federal rule. It provides for the backing of all papers required to be filed. It further provides that the attorney’s name on the back of the complaint shall constitute an endorsement for costs, where this is required, in the absence of any words showing a different purpose. This reflects existing law. See R.S.1954, Chap. 112, Sec. 6 (amended in 1959) [now 14 M.R.S.A. § 601]; Sawtelle v. Wardwell, 56 Me. 146.
Plain-English Summary
Once a case is underway, Rule 5 takes over from Rule 4 as the rule for moving paper — or, increasingly, electrons — between the parties and the court. Subdivision (a) lists what must be served on every party: later pleadings, discovery documents, most written motions, notices, and similar filings. Subdivision (b) sets how: through Electronic Service to a party’s or attorney’s email address when available, falling back to mail or delivery to the clerk when it is not. Unrepresented parties choose whether to opt in to Electronic Service.
The rest of the rule handles logistics that matter in practice: filings must generally be served no later than the date they are filed, defective filings get rejected with a notice explaining why, after-hours paper filings need a judge’s authorization, and most claims for relief must be accompanied by a completed summary sheet. Subdivision (i) sets the formatting every document must meet — double-spaced, at least 12-point type, one-sided pages, all pages numbered — and subdivision (j) makes clear that a fax is never an acceptable substitute for a signed original.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is Electronic Service under Rule 5?
The electronic transmission of a pleading or other document to a party or a party’s attorney by email; it is complete when transmitted, is presumed received, and carries the same legal effect as service of a paper document.
Do unrepresented parties have to accept Electronic Service?
No. An unrepresented party may opt in to Electronic Service, but is not required to; documents can otherwise be mailed to the party’s last known address.
What happens if a filing is missing a required signature or element?
The clerk rejects it as incomplete and sends the filer a rejection notice explaining the basis for the rejection; the clerk keeps a copy of the rejected filing and notice for six months, and the filer can refile once the missing element is corrected.