Rule 28.Persons Before Whom Depositions May be Taken
Last amended April 15, 1975 · Last verified July 8, 2026
Full Text of Rule 28
Advisory Committee’s Notes & Reporter’s Notes
Advisory Committee’s Note — April 15, 1975
Rule 28(d) is abrogated. The procedure which it provides is replaced by the revised procedures contained in simultaneous amendments adding Rules 30(h) and 31(d). Those rules are a more logical location for these provisions. The current amendments provide an appropriate opportunity for this clean-up change.
Advisory Committee's Note — November 1, 1969
The appointment of commissioners to take depositions under 16 M.R.S.A. §§ 554-56, has fallen into complete disuse, and 1969 Laws, c. 367, § 3 repeals those sections. The present amendment of Rule 28(a) eliminates the reference to commissioners appointed under that statute.
The other amendment of Rule 28(a) and the amendment in Rule 28(b) are made for the purpose of making available within another state or within a territory or insular possession subject to the dominion of the United States all the same options for deposition-taking as are available in foreign countries under the existing Rule 28(b). The present rule created the anomalous situation that there were fewer options for taking a deposition in the State of New Hampshire or the State of Louisiana than there were for taking a deposition in Canada. For example, the letter rogatory was not provided as a way for taking a deposition in another state. This revised form of Rule 28 follows Rule 28 of the Rhode Island Rules of Civil Procedure.
Explanation of Amendment — November 1, 1966; January 1, 1967
The amendment in Rule 28(a) merely updated the statutory reference.
Revised Rule 28(b) was taken from a 1963 amendment to F.R. 28(b), which was developed collaboratively by the Commission and Advisory Committee on International Rules of Judicial Procedure and the Federal Advisory Committee on Civil Rules. It enlarges the class of persons before whom depositions may be taken in a foreign country so as to include officers of the country in which the deposition is taken. It also makes clear that the appointment of a person to take a deposition in itself confers the power to administer any necessary oath, as Rule 28(a) already provides with respect to depositions within the United States. The amendment also seeks to overcome an antipathy to letters rogatory reflected in some federal decisions and to give the court a free choice in issuing a letter rogatory or a commission in the light of all the circumstances. The last sentence of the amended rule gives discretion to the trial court to admit a deposition taken under a letter rogatory which does not satisfy the ordinary requirements for depositions taken within the United States. In executing a letter rogatory a foreign court may be expected to follow its customary procedure for taking testimony, which may not be in accord with our own.
Reporter's Notes — December 1, 1959
This rule is similar to Federal Rule 28 but with some modifications and additions. The first sentence of Rule 28(a) preserves existing law. R.S.1954, Chap. 117, Sec. 2 (repealed in 1959). The reference in the statute to disqualification for interest is covered by Rule 28(c). Depositions without the state but within the United States may be taken before any of the enumerated persons. Compare R.S. 1954, Chap. 117, Sec. 20 (repealed in 1959).
Rule 28(b) covers depositions in foreign countries.
It is contemplated that under this rule depositions will be taken under the simple notice procedure whenever practicable. The notice procedure will not work, however, when it is necessary to enlist the aid of the foreign court to compel the attendance of the witness. Moreover, some foreign countries will not allow a person appointed by a court of another country to sit within their jurisdiction to take deposition testimony. This is true in Russia, Yugoslavia and Switzerland. Hence letters rogatory may be necessary. When the need arises to take a deposition in a foreign country, it is advisable to make inquiry of the State Department as to precisely what method may be used.
Rule 28(d), which is not included in the federal rule, is designed to help persons in other states get deposition testimony from witnesses in Maine. A witness who fails to respond to a subpoena for a deposition in an out-of-state action is punishable for contempt, and the court may order an answer in accordance with Rule 37(a) and punish for contempt in accordance with Rule 37(b) (1).
Plain-English Summary
A deposition is only as reliable as the person administering it. Within Maine, that person must be a notary public or someone the court appoints, either of whom has the power to administer oaths and take testimony. Outside the state but within the United States, a broader group of authorized officials can serve. In a foreign country, the rule offers three paths: a person authorized to administer oaths under local or United States law, a person the court appoints or commissions, or a letter rogatory requesting the assistance of the foreign court — and testimony taken abroad under a letter rogatory is not automatically excluded just because it lacks a verbatim transcript or was not taken under oath in the usual form.
Subdivision (c) protects the integrity of the process by disqualifying anyone who is a relative, employee, or attorney of a party, or who is financially interested in the action, from serving as the officer before whom a deposition is taken.
Frequently Asked Questions
Who can administer an oath for a deposition taken in Maine?
A notary public, or a person appointed by the court for that purpose, either of whom has the power to administer oaths and take testimony.
What options exist for taking a deposition in a foreign country?
Three: before a person authorized to administer oaths under the law of that place or of the United States, before a person the court appoints or commissions, or through a letter rogatory addressed to the appropriate authority in that country.
Who is disqualified from serving as a deposition officer?
Anyone who is a relative, employee, or attorney or counsel of a party, a relative or employee of that attorney or counsel, or anyone financially interested in the action.