Rule 110A.Prehearing Schedule and Procedure for Cases Involving Minor Children
Last amended October 1, 2022 · Last verified July 8, 2026
Full Text of Rule 110A
Advisory Committee’s Notes & Reporter’s Notes
Advisory Note – October 2022
The rule has been amended pursuant to P.L. 2021, ch. 723, § 6 (effective Aug. 8, 2022) (to be codified at 4 M.R.S. § 183(1)(D)(2)), to remove the process by which the parties had the right to have a judge determine interim parental rights and responsibilities. The statutory revision grants family law magistrates the authority to determine interim parental rights and responsibilities with or without the parties’ consent.
Advisory Note – July 2016
For the changes made to Rule 110A(a) and (b)(1), see the July 2016 Advisory Note to Rule 100. For the change made to Rule 110A(b)(4)(C), see the July 2016 Advisory Note to Rule 107. Although mediation is required for many family matters, it is not required for adoptions, name changes, or guardianships for minor children. See M.R. Civ. P. 92(b)(2). As a result, it was necessary to make changes to Rules 110A(b)(3)(B), 110A(b)(4)(C), and 110A(b)(5)(B), and to add Rule 110A(b)(5)(C). The changes to Rule 110A(b)(6)(B) refer to the statewide use of post-judgment “triage” lists and the post-triage referral to a judge of any cases not resolved, and reflect a recommendation made by the FDTF 2014 report. Additional changes throughout the rule correct typographical or grammatical errors, attempt to improve the readability of the rule, reflect the reality that some family matters have more than two parties, and reflect the Judicial Branch’s attempt to change all dates for deadlines to multiples of 7.
Advisory Committee’s Note — July 1, 2009
This amendment is added to Rule 110A(b)(4)(B) to recognize past and current practice that parties to domestic relations actions requiring mediation may, by agreement, arrange and pay for private mediation in place of mediation provided pursuant to Rule 92.
Advisory Notes — June 2008
The rule recognizes that pre-hearing procedure applies to two groups of Family Division actions—those with minor children and those without. Cases involving minor children should receive priority treatment. Rule 110A applies to actions involving minor children. Rule 110B applies to actions that do not involve minor children.
Rule 110A incorporates substantial portions of the current Family Division rules relating to calendaring and scheduling of cases and conduct of case management conferences.
Subdivision (a) is based on FAM DIV I.C. making specific reference to the authority and limitations on authority of Family Law Magistrates. It also corresponds with the accepted practice that emancipation actions have not been placed in the case management system because of their summary nature. It clarifies that magistrates may act in uncontested matters on post-judgment motions.
Subdivision (b)(1) is based on FAM DIV III.A.1. It relates to scheduling of conferences before Family Law Magistrates. FAM DIV III.A.1 states a list of issues that may be raised by the court or the parties and be considered at the conference. Subdivision(b)(1) does not include the list. The list of issues that may be addressed and actions that may be considered is stated in Rule 107(a) relating to interim orders and cross referenced in this draft to avoid duplication and confusion that might result from any different wording.
Child support affidavits are based on FAM DIV III.A.2 and are addressed by Rule 108. Subsection (b)(2) is based on FAM DIV III.A.3.
Subsection (b)(3)(A)(i) is based on FAM DIV III.A.4 and is amended to include requests to continue mediation.
Subsection (b)(3)(A)(ii) relating to deferral of a conference is a new provision and permits the parties to attend mediation before a conference with the court. The amendment also requires the parties to pay the mediation fee if mediation is requested.
Subsection (b)(3)(B) is based on FAM DIV III.A.5 and requires the parties to obtain dates for mediation and payment of the mediation fee.
Subsection (b)(4) is based on FAM DIV III.B.
Subsection (b)(5) is based on FAM DIV III.C.
Subsection (b)(6) is based on FAM DIV III.D. and Rule 80(k)(2). The new rule provides that Motions to Enforce shall be eliminated from the case management system to avoid delay in enforcing existing orders. This is consistent with the recommendation of the Family Division Task Force to reduce the number of conferences in family matters.
Plain-English Summary
In Family Division actions involving minor children, including cases transferred from Probate Court, Family Law Magistrates may hold case management and other prehearing conferences, decide whether a party or counsel may appear by phone, issue interim orders under Rule 107(a), act on expedited-hearing requests under Rule 107(c), enter final child support orders, order genetic testing, and issue child-support-enforcement orders. In uncontested matters, magistrates may issue divorce, paternity, and parentage judgments, judicial separation decrees, final parental-rights orders, guardianship and name-change orders, and post-judgment modifications of those orders. In contested interim proceedings, magistrates may decide interim parental-rights orders; in certain contested final proceedings under a pilot project the Chief Justice establishes, a magistrate may, with the parties' consent, decide all elements of specified divorce, separation, parentage, or parental-rights cases likely to finish within three hours. Magistrates may also amend the parental-rights portion of a protection-from-abuse order to match these authorized orders. None of this stops a judge from managing a case under these rules.
Once a complaint, petition, or motion involving minor children is filed, the parties and any counsel attend a case management conference, prepared to address pending motions, service issues, related cases, discovery disputes, domestic-violence concerns, and similar matters. Except for support-modification motions under 19-A M.R.S. § 2009, the court gives notice of the conference within 14 days after proof of service is filed, scheduled after the answer period runs; a support-modification conference is scheduled once a response comes in, or not scheduled at all if there's no response. Parties may request a continuance for good cause under Rule 40(a), an agreement to continue plus assurance the children's needs are met counts as good cause, or, by letter and the mediation fee, ask to defer the conference up to 91 days and proceed straight to mediation, provided they confirm the children's needs are met, there's no discovery dispute or domestic-violence issue, financial statements will be filed before mediation, and both parties join the request. Parties may also skip the initial conference altogether by filing a signed certificate describing their temporary agreement on the children's issues, what remains unresolved, and a date for a status conference, mediation, or final hearing within 91 days.
A magistrate may enter interim orders, with or without the parties' consent or in default, at any stage, including a Family Division Scheduling Order. When the parties can't reach an interim agreement, or the court has deferred the conference at their request, mediation is scheduled under Rule 92(b), though a magistrate may waive it for good cause, including when the parties agree to pay for private mediation instead. The court reviews any mediated agreement and may enter it as an interim or final order. Where mediation doesn't resolve an interim dispute, or mediation isn't required, the magistrate may hold a hearing capped at three hours and enter an interim order. After an interim order, an uncontested case moves to final hearing; a contested case where required mediation hasn't happened goes to mediation first, then to an uncontested or contested final hearing depending on the outcome, a magistrate hears a case where child support is the only disputed issue, and a judge presides when other issues remain disputed, unless the parties agree otherwise under Rule 114(b)(3). The same case-management process governs post-judgment modification motions, and parties may skip the conference by filing a signed, sworn certificate with a stipulated order when the motion is unopposed or resolved by agreement; an unopposed child-support modification may be waived and decided by the magistrate under 19-A M.R.S. § 2009(6). Motions to enforce a judgment go to a magistrate on a post-judgment docket, and if not resolved there, to a judge, who may order mediation or a prompt hearing; contempt proceedings always go to a judge. A magistrate's case-management and interim orders take effect when signed, stay effective until amended or superseded by a final order, carry the enforceability of a court order and full faith and credit, and don't bind the court as law of the case, the final hearing decides the merits anew.
Frequently Asked Questions
What authority do Family Law Magistrates have in Maine Family Division cases with minor children?
They can hold conferences, decide phone-appearance requests, issue interim orders and final child support orders, order genetic testing, issue enforcement orders, and, in uncontested matters, sign divorce, parentage, and related judgments.
Can parties skip the initial case management conference in a case involving children?
Yes, by filing a signed certificate showing a temporary agreement on the children's issues and a scheduled date for the next step, or by requesting a deferral of up to 91 days to proceed directly to mediation.
Who decides a contested Family Division case involving minor children, a magistrate or a judge?
A magistrate if child support is the only disputed issue; a judge if other issues remain contested, unless the parties agree under Rule 114(b)(3) to have a magistrate decide the whole case.