Rule 44.13.Effect of Rule
Rule 44. HABEAS CORPUS PROCEEDINGS IN DEATH SENTENCE CASES · Last amended 1996 · Last verified July 17, 2026
Full Text of Rule 44.13
Plain-English Summary
Rule 44.13 closes out Rule 44 with two related statements about what the rule is and isn’t. First, it gives the Supreme Court a way to enforce compliance: upon application of any party, the Supreme Court may order the relief necessary to make sure Rule 44’s procedures are followed.
Second, and just as important, it limits what a violation of Rule 44 can accomplish. The rule provides procedural guidelines only — it confers no substantive rights on anyone — and no violation of it can serve as the basis for granting habeas corpus relief. A missed deadline under Rule 44 is a case-management problem to be corrected, not a freestanding ground for winning the underlying habeas claim.
That distinction protects the purpose of the rule. Rule 44 exists to move capital habeas cases along on a predictable schedule, not to create a new procedural trap that could decide a case on a technicality rather than the merits of the petitioner’s claim.
Frequently Asked Questions
Can the Supreme Court step in if Rule 44 isn’t being followed?
Yes — upon application of any party, the Supreme Court may order such relief as it finds necessary to assure compliance with the rule.
Does Rule 44 create new substantive legal rights for petitioners or respondents?
No. The rule states that no substantive rights are conferred upon any person.
Can a missed deadline under Rule 44 be the basis for granting habeas corpus relief?
No — the rule states that no violation of it shall be the basis of any grant of habeas corpus relief.
What kind of rule does Rule 44.13 say Rule 44 is?
It says the rule provides procedural guidelines.
Who may apply to the Supreme Court for relief to assure compliance?
Any party.
Amendment History
Amended effective January 11, 1996.