RulesofCivilProcedure.com Civil Procedure · Every State

Rule 36.19.Digital Recording of Court Proceedings

Rule 36. FILING AND PROCESSING · Last amended 2026 · Last verified July 17, 2026

In one sentenceGoverns digital recording of superior court proceedings authorized by statute (excluding depositions), covering who may operate the system, how recordings are stored and later transcribed by certified court reporters, the technical capabilities every system must have, and each circuit’s authority to set its own local protocols.

Full Text of Rule 36.19

Text sizeJump to: (1) (2) (3)

(A) Application of Rule. This rule for digital recording shall apply to all superior court proceedings for which the use of a digital recording system is authorized pursuant to OCGA §§ 5-6-41, 9-14-50, and 15-14-1. This rule does not apply to depositions, the takedown of which is governed by OCGA § 9-11-30 (b) (4).
(B) Operation of Digital Recording Systems.
(1) Digital Monitors. The term “digital monitor,” as used in this rule, refers to the individual who operates a digital recording system. To serve as a digital monitor, an individual must:
(a) be at least 18 years of age, (b) be a high school graduate (or equivalent), and (c) have undergone training approved by the chief judge of the circuit to provide the
skills necessary for effective and reliable operation of the digital recording system.
A digital monitor shall use his or her best efforts to accurately and reliably record the proceedings and monitor the effectiveness of the digital recording system to the end that the digital recording may be used by a certified court reporter to create an accurate transcript of the proceedings.
(2) Storage. The digital monitor is responsible for producing digital recordings of court proceedings using a digital recording system. These digital recordings shall be the property of
the court in which they are created. The court, through the clerk of court, court administrator, or other designee, shall retain the digital recordings in accordance with the Official Judicial Branch Court Records Retention Schedules.
(3) Transcription. If a party seeks a transcript of a proceeding that has been recorded by a digital recording system as contemplated by this rule, the party shall request that the court send a copy of the digital recording to a certified court reporter who is authorized by the Board of Court Reporting to create transcripts. That certified court reporter shall be authorized to prepare and certify the transcript to the same extent that he or she is currently permitted to prepare and certify transcripts for proceedings that he or she attended and took down through any means authorized by the Board. The form and style of the transcript shall comply with all applicable rules and regulations. The transcript shall not be created by the digital monitor unless the digital monitor is also a certified court reporter. Any transcript made from a digital recording of a proceeding for which the certified court reporter was not present shall bear a statement as such:
“I, [Name], Certified Court Reporter, do hereby certify that the foregoing transcript was generated from a digital recording made outside my presence after a review of the recording, as well as any related materials, and that it is true and correct to the best of my ability. I have noted any possible inaccuracies or limitations inherent in the digital recording.”
(C) Technical Requirements of Digital Recording Systems. Each circuit that implements a digital recording system shall determine which recording system(s) it will use, subject to the following minimum requirements:
1. Each system shall record the audio of a court’s proceedings and store the recording in a digital format. 2. Each system shall support multiple channel recording. 3. Each system shall allow the creation of digital backups. 4. Each system must be able to access a digital recording using rewind, fast forward, search by timestamp, and other direct access methods to enable a system operator to quickly find passages of interest. 5. Each system must continuously monitor all microphones. 6. Each system must continuously monitor the storage medium and provide at least visual indication to the operator that the signal is being recorded. 7. Each system shall include microphones on counsel tables that are individually mutable by the user.
(D) Local Protocols. Each circuit that chooses to utilize a digital recording system shall establish its own internal written policies for managing the digital takedown process.

Plain-English Summary

Rule 36.19 is a detailed roadmap for courts that use digital recording instead of a live court reporter to capture proceedings, as authorized under specific Georgia statutes. It does not apply to depositions, which have their own separate takedown rules.

The rule starts with the person running the equipment — the “digital monitor” — who must be at least 18, a high school graduate or equivalent, and have completed training approved by the chief judge of the circuit. That person’s job is to record proceedings accurately and keep an eye on the system so a certified court reporter can later turn the recording into a reliable transcript. The recordings themselves belong to the court that created them, and the clerk, a court administrator, or another designee is responsible for retaining them under the state’s official court records retention schedules.

When someone needs a transcript, the court sends the recording to a certified court reporter authorized by the Board of Court Reporting, who prepares and certifies it under the same standards that apply to transcripts made from live proceedings. If that reporter was not present for the original proceeding, the transcript must carry a certification statement disclosing that it was generated from a recording reviewed after the fact, noting any inaccuracies or limitations the reporter observed.

The rule then sets minimum technical requirements every digital recording system must meet — recording and storing audio digitally, supporting multiple channels, creating backups, allowing quick navigation by timestamp, continuously monitoring microphones and storage, giving the operator a recording indicator, and including individually mutable microphones at counsel tables. Beyond those baseline features, each circuit that adopts a digital recording system is left to write its own internal, written protocols for managing the process.

Frequently Asked Questions

What qualifications must a digital monitor have under Rule 36.19?

The monitor must be at least 18 years old, a high school graduate or equivalent, and have completed training approved by the chief judge of the circuit.

Who owns the digital recordings made of court proceedings?

The recordings are the property of the court in which they are created.

Can the digital monitor prepare the official transcript from a recording?

Only if the digital monitor is also a certified court reporter; otherwise the transcript must be created by a certified court reporter authorized by the Board of Court Reporting.

What must a transcript state if the certifying court reporter was not present for the proceeding?

It must include a certification statement disclosing that the transcript was generated from a digital recording reviewed after the fact, noting any possible inaccuracies or limitations in the recording.

Does Rule 36.19 apply to depositions?

No. The rule expressly states it does not apply to depositions, which are governed by OCGA § 9-11-30(b)(4).

Amendment History

Adopted effective February 26, 2026.

Source & verification. Rule text and amendment history are reproduced verbatim from the Uniform Superior Court Rules, published by the Council of Superior Court Judges of Georgia. Last verified July 17, 2026. · Official source
Also known as: Georgia digital recording court proceedings ruleUSCR 36.19 digital monitor requirementscertified court reporter digital recording transcript Georgiadigital recording system technical requirements superior courthow are Georgia court proceedings digitally recorded