RulesofCivilProcedure.com Civil Procedure · Every State

Rule 36.17.Sensitive Information

Rule 36. FILING AND PROCESSING · Last amended 2015 · Last verified July 17, 2026

In one sentenceLimits filed pleadings and papers to only the last four digits of a social security, taxpayer ID, or financial account number and the year of a person’s birth, putting the redaction burden on counsel and the parties rather than the clerk.

Full Text of Rule 36.17

Text sizeJump to: (1) (2) (3) (4)

(A) In accord with OCGA § 9-11-7.1 and in order to promote public electronic access to case files while also protecting sensitive information, pleadings and other papers filed with a court, including exhibits thereto, whether filed electronically or in paper, unless otherwise ordered by the court shall include only:
(1) The last four digits of a social security number;
(2) The last four digits of a taxpayer identification number;
(3) The last four digits of a financial account number; and
(4) The year of an individual’s birth.
(B) The responsibility for omitting or redacting these personal identifiers rests solely with counsel and the parties. The clerk will not review filings for compliance with this rule.
(C) A party having a legitimate need for the above information may obtain it through the ordinary course of discovery without further order of the court.
(D) This rule does not create a private right of action against a court, a clerk, counsel or any other individual or entity that may have erroneously included identifying information in a filed document that is made available electronically or otherwise.
(E) This rule does not amend or modify Uniform Superior Court Rule 21, Limitation of Access to Court Files.

Plain-English Summary

Rule 36.17 protects personal identifiers in court filings by limiting how much of them can appear. Whether a document is filed on paper or electronically, it may include only the last four digits of a social security number, the last four digits of a taxpayer identification number, the last four digits of a financial account number, and an individual’s birth year — never the full number or a complete birth date. This is Georgia’s answer to the privacy risk created by broad public access to electronic case files under OCGA § 9-11-7.1.

The rule places the redaction duty squarely on counsel and the parties, not the clerk. The clerk does not review filings for compliance, which means it is up to the person preparing a document to catch a full social security number or account number before it goes into the file. A party who has a legitimate need for the unredacted information — in discovery, for instance — can still get it through the ordinary discovery process without asking the court for a special order.

The rule also limits its own reach. It does not create a private right of action against a court, clerk, attorney, or anyone else who mistakenly includes identifying information in a filing that becomes publicly available, and it does not change Rule 21’s separate limits on access to court files.

Frequently Asked Questions

What personal identifiers may appear in a filed pleading under Rule 36.17?

Only the last four digits of a social security number, the last four digits of a taxpayer identification number, the last four digits of a financial account number, and the year of an individual’s birth.

Who is responsible for redacting sensitive information from a filing?

The responsibility rests solely with counsel and the parties; the clerk does not review filings for compliance with this rule.

Can a party obtain a person’s full social security number or account number if they need it?

Yes, a party with a legitimate need for that information may obtain it through the ordinary course of discovery without a further court order.

Can someone sue a clerk or attorney for accidentally including full identifying information in a filed document?

No. The rule does not create a private right of action against a court, clerk, counsel, or other individual or entity for erroneously including such information.

Does Rule 36.17 change the rules governing limitation of access to court files?

No. The rule states it does not amend or modify Uniform Superior Court Rule 21, Limitation of Access to Court Files.

Amendment History

Adopted effective June 4, 2015.

Source & verification. Rule text and amendment history are reproduced verbatim from the Uniform Superior Court Rules, published by the Council of Superior Court Judges of Georgia. Last verified July 17, 2026. · Official source
Also known as: Georgia court filing redaction ruleUSCR 36.17 sensitive informationsocial security number redaction court filings Georgialast four digits SSN pleading ruleprotecting personal identifiers superior court filings