Rule 31.4.Motion and Order for Evaluation Regarding Mental Competency to Stand Trial
Rule 31. MOTIONS, DEMURRERS, SPECIAL PLEAS, AND SIMILAR ITEMS IN CRIMINAL MATTERS · Last amended 2013 · Last verified July 17, 2026
Full Text of Rule 31.4
Plain-English Summary
Rule 31.4 addresses one question: whether a defendant now has the mental capacity to stand trial. It reaches pending superior court cases generally, but carves out two kinds of proceedings entirely: involuntary treatment proceedings under OCGA Title 37, and guardian-appointment proceedings under Title 29. When the accused’s mental competency is brought into question, a written motion may be filed setting out the allegations and grounds for a court-ordered evaluation. If the judge is persuaded by a proper showing, the court can exercise its discretion to order the evaluation at public expense and direct the Department of Behavioral Health and Developmental Disabilities to carry it out, coordinating the time and place with the county sheriff if the defendant is in custody or with defense counsel if the defendant is not.
The clerk sends the Department a copy of the order along with the indictment, accusation, or charging document, the police arrest report where one exists, and a summary of any known or alleged prior mental health treatment or hospitalization. Defense counsel must forward any other background information available to help the evaluator do the job. The finished report goes to the requesting judge for distribution to the defendant’s attorney, and it stays under seal — it cannot be released without a court order.
Once a defendant files a formal Plea of Mental Incompetency to Stand Trial, the court gives the prosecuting attorney a copy of the evaluation, and a bench trial follows to resolve the competency question. Either side can change that default: if the state or the defendant demands a special jury trial within twenty days of the plea being filed, the judge tries the issue to a jury instead. Rule 31.4 attaches specimen orders for both stages — one directing the initial evaluation, and one entering judgment on a sustained plea, which covers outpatient evaluation for defendants charged with nonviolent offenses, a ninety-day window for the evaluation, and what happens if the defendant’s competency is restored or, instead, is not expected to return in the foreseeable future.
Frequently Asked Questions
What must happen before a judge orders a competency evaluation under Rule 31.4?
A motion for mental evaluation may be filed in writing, setting out the allegations and grounds; if the judge is persuaded by a proper showing, the judge may exercise discretion to order a mental evaluation at public expense.
Who carries out the competency evaluation, and how is it arranged?
The Department of Behavioral Health and Developmental Disabilities performs the evaluation, coordinating the time and place with the county sheriff if the defendant is in custody or with defense counsel if the defendant is not.
What background materials get forwarded to the evaluating department?
The clerk forwards a copy of the order, the indictment, accusation, or specification of charges, the police arrest report where available, and a summary of any known or alleged prior mental health treatment or hospitalization; defense counsel must forward any other background information available to assist the evaluator.
What happens to the completed competency evaluation report?
It is submitted to the requesting judge for distribution to the defendant’s attorney and is placed under seal, unreleased absent a court order — except that once a Plea of Mental Incompetency to Stand Trial is filed, the court provides a copy to the prosecuting attorney.
How does the court resolve a Plea of Mental Incompetency to Stand Trial?
The judge conducts a bench trial on the competency issue unless the state or the defendant demands a special jury trial within twenty days of the plea’s filing.
Amendment History
Amended effective October 9, 1997; November 10, 2005; May 23, 2013.