Rule 3.4.Local Authority
Rule 3. ASSIGNMENT OF CASES AND ACTIONS · Last amended 2010 · Last verified July 17, 2026
Full Text of Rule 3.4
Plain-English Summary
Rule 3.4 hands local circuits the authority Rule 3.1 already anticipates — the ability to elect a different assignment system than the default equal-distribution plan. The method of assignment, and the procedures needed for an orderly transition from one calendaring system to another, are established by each multi-judge circuit itself, not imposed uniformly by this rule.
That local authority comes with a transparency requirement attached. Whatever system a circuit adopts must be adequately published to the local bar, and copies of it must be filed with the respective clerk or clerks and with the Supreme Court of Georgia. Those filing and publication steps give the bar notice of how a circuit assigns its cases and give the Supreme Court a record of what each circuit has chosen to do.
Frequently Asked Questions
Who establishes the method of case assignment within a multi-judge circuit?
Each multi-judge circuit establishes its own method of assignment.
What must a circuit do when moving from one calendaring system to another?
Establish the procedures necessary for an orderly transition between the two systems.
Who must a circuit’s assignment system be published to?
The local bar — Rule 3.4 requires the system to be adequately published to it.
Where must copies of a circuit’s assignment system be filed?
With the respective clerk or clerks and with the Supreme Court of Georgia.
When was Rule 3.4 last amended?
October 7, 2010.
Amendment History
Amended effective October 7, 2010.